From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Yuri Khan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 19:06:30 +0700 Message-ID: References: <8360ojpndr.fsf@gnu.org> <83shrnm0k1.fsf@gnu.org> <075B0922-F07A-4FBA-AE71-027E964A5ED4@raeburn.org> <54AAC13A-CF56-4393-A932-DC6CBBF51259@raeburn.org> <3CC6BB36-1794-4202-8243-132E0345B236@raeburn.org> <52BDCC33-546C-4F47-A230-00EBC813B038@raeburn.org> <15CF14CC-C7DE-44BA-AC7D-F0BF1F160979@raeburn.org> <9463F91F-DB82-48E1-BE01-1E2BC8DA0766@raeburn.org> <5b39d866-16ea-8cf1-f25e-6bfc3304ac2a@cornell.edu> <16B1EC9C-9BF7-432E-BE42-154740B04679@raeburn.org> <00AE6236-2C0B-4E2A-8A53-16A5C42D41A9@raeburn.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481717314 6484 195.159.176.226 (14 Dec 2016 12:08:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:08:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ken Raeburn , Emacs developers To: Phil Sainty Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 14 13:08:29 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cH8MD-0000Fk-Lo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:08:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47045 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cH8MH-0004hw-Uq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 07:08:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44307) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cH8M8-0004ZU-Dk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 07:08:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cH8M4-0007Nf-Ar for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 07:08:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qt0-f180.google.com ([209.85.216.180]:33157) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cH8M4-0007JD-5Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 07:08:16 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qt0-f180.google.com with SMTP id p16so18080247qta.0 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 04:07:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=kDTpqTjpjzXvMqPI5RI2n7deo3QrsaucIGPueGoHdt0=; b=lba7ZpHCW61BpI2F8Y207DeMBU7vVMveP/i2TJyIhNhB8Sph0Vb3eVaSpfiECVKR28 cIQwIuS6OyrocIngXV9JUCGTDTK3hQQ1kMUk5AUbyA+BBytRHvZ7EiibOwfnulCSNcnv bkwBR2EE8DXiCZFZMPHvIvPuhGgEb4hCkvsZBr3/I2gYNH6Ujqm2oN6MiO6jpb/u37Wh 4ou20YAgUUTEj36a/5uq/YBKK5o5ka7WVSJcprQJIEoZRvZUfj5oxO4j7D+yA1PzQI53 HJdx3OYsF9mHx6FWw2/zir2g4ESAJs/LlW3m+MxOdqD26rnv8zTLuPOdHwgDQZFLODFy ALSw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kDTpqTjpjzXvMqPI5RI2n7deo3QrsaucIGPueGoHdt0=; b=G4pJKWaPpg9H1l20MRaw24omeND2DkDNoYXCJRoicdIcDwnbsxoFK9slLBzj1S3ZDD jTwZBLLSkJFPrhEoS853JkP5GwDxhAmu7cKxHiRdlAzR2G7YPQhIyXzzeZ9OTd/BtvyZ 3yuhJYP63B5diDC/vnxtm2phqtaqxyNquar8bhp6GtJ/S6bPmzH4nxm3wxJ6Oxxcq+0c r/g22U7wE3tj46oD9zT29GBx3AaNcYyeNRJt0QX0QGFTFNufNQqfn5L2MNP4utUwxq6Q S4+OHHwzmn+jSjW71OngFMuhYFuVFFzINtSC4WBohU2QmtSfDKtXEC1CVO5zTdPFF+rq d2jg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC032N9/oI8epPMMI98PIgcznUcX38Aew9RXstV90AmxyoDtI5HdFV3SzTQWDgkERF7fivaSUB/NKfT2D9A== X-Received: by 10.25.242.7 with SMTP id q7mr14015663lfh.19.1481717211532; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 04:06:51 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.114.77.161 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 04:06:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: GzXTIv5JrdAg2r3oQwnsdDawkJQ X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.216.180 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:210446 Archived-At: On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Phil Sainty wrote: > If you *really really* want to push a revised history -- bearing > in mind that it will cause merge issues for anyone who has already > pulled from that branch (which is why you would usually refrain > from doing such a thing, and why server-side protection like this > exists in the first place) -- then you can generally work around > the protection by deleting the upstream branch and then pushing > your new version of it. Scratch branches are personal and others should exercise caution if/when pulling them. It is okay for the branch owner to delete and recreate it.