On 2 June 2013 18:58, Richard Copley wrote: > On 2 June 2013 18:23, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > If so, does "make autoloads" in the Lisp > >> directory solve the problem? >> > Possibly, I will check. But make should still make, right? > "make autoloads" in the lisp directory succeeds, but there are errors from some of the commands (this is perhaps nearer the root cause of the error). Subsequent "make" still fails as before. I've attached the output of "make autoloads 2>&1".