From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Copley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: dumped_data_commit: memory exhausted Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 12:36:33 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83h97mjpyb.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478349505 10634 195.159.176.226 (5 Nov 2016 12:38:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 12:38:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Development To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 05 13:38:20 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c30EJ-0006v9-C4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 13:37:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47357 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c30EM-0006BU-AQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 08:37:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35928) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c30Db-0006BA-Ms for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 08:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c30Da-00023G-Ti for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 08:37:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ua0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22e]:32949) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c30DZ-0001zl-AP; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 08:37:05 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ua0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 20so87008667uak.0; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 05:37:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yspMz9SuKc9Ot5hhXJnfPY3va+Ch8jeTZ9/bdlzbiSw=; b=Y7eO14GbYoCO760GgP59i0oNMzEDVj1t+V/qg9YC7AR0sLksoxC8SqS+0H1qDt33AR eF8PJiFwjapoQftfurMCt5lq5atjfajYfSH9rgwsZY1WuYQFQpiO6+UiY6O08iEN16/h q/qjyhzkA0UHKrugAzZemlRVnLO7nZYSVdN6N7/0ibFpYkCWzL0AlYTW/G7OcIkMmm+6 O3D3C3rcxbUdu9ZIbPPxWGYHqZUVSaA40ZLE3wkLkoc7SChY+jBIUVswp7a1y/pAxbV3 3zhMT+NFke6keiOtKyOXrFxPXVvB9Gb7cXNZf5nsM8dZ14cTcEEk6I3NAyeqtQEwylgq cbgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yspMz9SuKc9Ot5hhXJnfPY3va+Ch8jeTZ9/bdlzbiSw=; b=AUo6wNq+iRGzOyNVq1pZ6lbDNUaXhaEKTY/7NVPW4Io0L3czcI5WQ5sVYcOEP/XikF Z51IkgltP7y7o5S7S64ew06WYVDlixhsvZSM0VFspmt/2YJPObfR0M58bCKltA5b4lYt PnGtIPZOE4D7iZVRA4PjnTDwPSnVV2ZSxUuac7VzxZGjY8Rzt2xHt5zFNTU7aJQDY4RO gKG4iUNq4OS8tbGl5lnYeHDVHHcO5BE4k+hWxvowm67/t0ACS1KftB99Nbtv6kbjR24Q RN7ECY8Yv8LmpWawB3WSse/6x9seF9cjBr+wFFoXmyK9f2ui9wPZ+q3twfbx66mPvSHc SwnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdItMBfHoWJerQEgBQXY4/orxsAkUcxBU1XzKwNoUuRGkaBrV6ZlbNr3eIWA70/utJkywEcgDcmR8aWTA== X-Received: by 10.176.68.103 with SMTP id m94mr5150648uam.75.1478349423763; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 05:37:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.176.16.66 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 05:36:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83h97mjpyb.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209182 Archived-At: On 5 November 2016 at 08:22, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Richard Copley >> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 21:45:02 +0000 >> >> Building current emacs master with the current 64-bit MinGW-W64 >> toolchain from MSYS2 (gcc 6.2), on Windows 10, I get: >> >> dumped_data_commit: memory exhausted >> >> Increasing DUMPED_HEAP_SIZE from 20 to 21 in w32heap.c >> lets the build succeed. > > When that happens, simply push a change that increases the value to a > safe level. (I did it this time.) > > Thanks. Thanks Eli, and apologies, I don't have the privilege to push changes.