From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Copley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Future release of emacs-26 Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 22:28:17 +0100 Message-ID: References: <871s1ent89.fsf@gmail.com> <87pnovlr5z.fsf@gmail.com> <83k1f3k3rm.fsf@gnu.org> <87y339g9g7.fsf_-_@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a86f990588dfb774" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="132931"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Emacs Development To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 14 23:29:32 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hQezG-000YOW-Cj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 23:29:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54704 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQezF-0004EA-CH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:29:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45784) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQeyc-0004Dh-6u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:28:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQeya-0003iL-Uo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:28:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ot1-x330.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::330]:38857) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQeya-0003hZ-PI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:28:44 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-x330.google.com with SMTP id s19so286670otq.5 for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 14:28:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=a0kGCScmVAiBKYL3y2gR5qQPdq14h41iRRxrh52M20A=; b=X/B8kvSAoK4C5bjl652fxi+KnU2f7OSyrV5KqB6iB0Z1E5MMJP51nWp4b0qHiWNjUp WwFcXW/HI6B+SDwAjuDbE+uniRATWSxH10LS7zsYTI43Ch9XABG/fQvPIgpWYT7biBVy XvNdAbSRxRfwFIie5CEnARryB7KrXizdJuX/R1F+QMXvM4Km9+gfY7iP4vfUNlly2nI3 ClRA7C4BaiDabU71yTwgd+nkUWsYkOHwV53WdOaWs8fGHu4DYUBDm59ji0NUeZC14I1w IWoaprnbJDqjoff2ljOhe0Fs7TCVPM1EQlURbNn3N3zlGYitGxt1hwj9npT+rrHyLBFs 17mg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=a0kGCScmVAiBKYL3y2gR5qQPdq14h41iRRxrh52M20A=; b=fxkmzuZT1lB/G3cfueC40xWMpkUk+3vRGogXZN9KX18jqbro5tD/xo5XcxOauEkpMT k6T23AZhAE872fMkTeFABaRotuT4kxiIRgn2vjWf+2Y5XZL0dtCM/2IBmug6i98/8I1l g2yP72c4uRPFMxmgsqc4+d3jLIm6BSWKyzbVc42pa/MF3pYWB+Ey273LDGJJsu/UV15G PTWBUbZ3Uzu1cPPbt3h/at9KnL9dsM65sDtgG1ozMPWzObXhkfV5p9NzMII5MXhuZbF7 p5UCPdPJBVoi2nJnVQ9uTCj+/iFLk97K/sqC5qEt1tNW9XS3A1VsgVROEMkNlBuQAN49 jI8A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX6fa9AL/MENPRHk1m+NafAMmTLII10EIlvBpKkibzaMVXpQVoc BpLWHXQlBdf4l5g1SLd6IQZXJAhX7IrAOhppW5gkEiuLNoM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzu6WpNcNL90vLtSdf5D4V6tCLnfR8oAaie4mJG9tKl9YuPfbuOpQddKzuuIZBoPYCu6uy9WeWWbfdz8a0Aj9E= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5e91:: with SMTP id f17mr3815045otl.368.1557869323905; Tue, 14 May 2019 14:28:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::330 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236521 Archived-At: --000000000000a86f990588dfb774 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 22:08, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > The signature checking has never worked anyway, though. > > Maybe not for you, but it's supposed to work, and AFAIK it works for > many people. > Oh, sorry. I always assumed this was why package-check-signatures defaulted to allow-unsigned. > > Will having a newer > > signature make a difference? If I rename my .emacs.d/ and run "emacs" > > (master), > > then "M-x package-list", I get this: > > > > Failed to verify signature archive-contents.sig: > > Bad signature from 474F05837FBDEF9B GNU ELPA Signing Agent (2014) < > > elpasign@elpa.gnu.org> > > Command output: > > gpg: Signature made 05/14/19 10:10:03 GMT Summer Time > > gpg: using DSA key > CA442C00F91774F17F59D9B0474F05837FBDEF9B > > gpg: BAD signature from "GNU ELPA Signing Agent (2014) < > > elpasign@elpa.gnu.org>" [unknown] > > > > This is on Windows, with gpg 2.2.11 on the path. > > Sounds like a bug. Could you report it as such, so we can track it > (and hopefully fix it for 26.3)? > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35739 Thanks. --000000000000a86f990588dfb774 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 22:08, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umo= ntreal.ca> wrote:
> The signature checking has never worked anyway, though.

Maybe not for you, but it's supposed to work, and AFAIK it works for many people.

Oh, sorry. I always assume= d this was why package-check-signatures defaulted
to allow-unsign= ed.
=C2=A0
> Will having a newer
> signature make a difference? If I rename my .emacs.d/ and run "em= acs"
> (master),
> then "M-x package-list", I get this:
>
> Failed to verify signature archive-contents.sig:
> Bad signature from 474F05837FBDEF9B GNU ELPA Signing Agent (2014) <=
> elpasign@el= pa.gnu.org>
> Command output:
> gpg: Signature made 05/14/19 10:10:03 GMT Summer Time
> gpg:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 using DSA = key CA442C00F91774F17F59D9B0474F05837FBDEF9B
> gpg: BAD signature from "GNU ELPA Signing Agent (2014) <
> elpasign@el= pa.gnu.org>" [unknown]
>
> This is on Windows, with gpg 2.2.11 on the path.

Sounds like a bug.=C2=A0 Could you report it as such, so we can track it (and hopefully fix it for 26.3)?

https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D35739

<= div>Thanks.

--000000000000a86f990588dfb774--