Re: Questions: classical X embedding, vc for Fossil

[Richard Copley <rcopley@gmail.com>]

On 8 December 2016 at 11:20, René Kuligowski
<renekuligowski@alice-dsl.net> wrote:
> Me again, Forgot one thing:
>
> On 08.12.2016 09:51, René Kuligowski wrote:
>
> (…)
>>
>> concerning the X-embedding: yes, it matters, in a way –– why embed an own
>> DocView pane for DVI/PDF- and image-viewing, but staying there when it would
>> be easy *and* make sense to do the same for the three browsers (w3, w3m,
>> eww) to use the full capabilities of a graphical pane instead of a textual
>> one.  IMHO the GTK3-Webkit-widget-embedding is sort of a short-circuited
>> action without any sense or purpose and should have been replaced with
>> native X pane/widget embedding.
>>
> …for, eg., an AuCTeX/syncTeX preview pane, an embedded xterm as
> fully-capable shell launched by eshell-visual-command, using X-widgets for
> customize, ses, etc.  The possibillities are almost endless.  Think about
> it, it makes sense.

Nope! Acronym salad. I can't make head nor tail of it. :)

> Again, best regards, ;-)