From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Copley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 25.1 released Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 23:35:46 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87fuoyzbfu.fsf@petton.fr> <7685c68a-64e3-4c0b-85a6-109b49b1a938@default> <874m5ez55j.fsf@petton.fr> <8760puxl77.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474151823 19373 195.159.176.226 (17 Sep 2016 22:37:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 22:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nicolas Petton , Kaushal Modi , Drew Adams , emacs-devel To: Phillip Lord Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 18 00:36:58 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1blOEC-0004Gc-AJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 00:36:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47859 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blOE9-00031H-Ku for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 18:36:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47183) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blODb-00030t-Oe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 18:36:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blODZ-0007CA-RB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 18:36:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vk0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::233]:36337) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blODZ-0007BW-NT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 18:36:17 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-vk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id m62so76372082vkd.3 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:36:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jfFxzenbH7SnUD+BMf48fRyH0eZcWDjpgs42F8qzBQA=; b=S9Y+mvb4TRHmyICekPVdP9kH1NOrcuIkor2aIYkfZ/YrNqXeoSQWnnGTfX/8VAGDNZ DHWvvgC4rJSZx14+2YnciRhK0qo+GKv8x1+18RfhiY5TCkH4Qcmg+srzQmbaufxQ77y0 s7xZ2+Dp1YqiK8EajwbfooJ+XN+UfxjAEfovQyFc7E97T8CFSnxFbwGT4avgMi4APLP9 6ORS4i0rhpCyyHC032YM+O6WjZELLG/EwesJYfTtD7mKWdRwVJxViFLiqw7inP/OJies rnBVGKmzA+hFQa0T5D08TMmiMNgZViK/gaTXHUHBSYUOdRsHBLBr4XJnXF+R0BGUU49B pGxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jfFxzenbH7SnUD+BMf48fRyH0eZcWDjpgs42F8qzBQA=; b=iDKXKO9dqeUCQW1eUEg0ChtPGQChWeaMT+hgKkQsOJkln/E8EmMqqdnTkerc7/Xln8 OuMjAOs4Nj6EUJIFLdE/VQaGCrz1zZnwGNdxJ/MJpcJSwqs92OgNpof6lAoeFRN0Nadb MQssLJEnypLhpHpVL/cO9ySJ3PTDmOLfjCBt/cIkBrZ9Fvw7h992ViMqjTRezSkvRatK 8sSMFpC0vhVIqufbIAjZ2NB4UFq4AHVm5RBfgK4Hv0y2ZH8++SdmO21LD66q9hKGA81l 7pqEIqDnPSntzB7wsLHdbwFZ+EoHYTuX/otru3Km2ZQZNEmMD1koZxXf5jwlC+l+DBK9 2McA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOmjkz7T/RuBZi7AX6SqN+IXZO/R9009fITkeYLfYhiwBAIR2woNp/Pt6GGtl9Hcptl5l+hQ3djpJf8zQ== X-Received: by 10.31.8.80 with SMTP id 77mr9352523vki.154.1474151777296; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.176.82.176 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:35:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8760puxl77.fsf@russet.org.uk> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c05::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207517 Archived-At: On 17 September 2016 at 22:36, Phillip Lord wrote: > > In the interests of time, I've uploaded binaries to alpha: > > http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/pretest/windows/ > > I normally, test these binaries on a different machine from the one I > build on, but I can't do that at the weekend. I'd be happy if some one > can try them out (32 and 64 bit) and let me know if they are good. > > Thanks > > Phil They both launch fine on my machine, with an empty PATH, and work (at least, for at few minutes of doing stuff) without any problems.