From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wtm Subject: Re: TODO keyword highlighting for headings with properties broken Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:30:11 -0500 Message-ID: References: <540750fd.c65a420a.4b18.3f7b@mx.google.com> <87bnqwd1r1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8738c8cwr4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87egvs8aqd.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c12514bd364005023421d5 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPMoQ-0001aD-6R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 22:30:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPMoN-0006YM-UI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 22:30:14 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c01::236]:40315) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPMoN-0006YI-Oa for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 22:30:11 -0400 Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id m20so9623522qcx.41 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 19:30:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87egvs8aqd.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --001a11c12514bd364005023421d5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Trevor, Thanks so much for mentioning this. I considered using these to roll back to 8/25 but I wasn't sure how much performance I would lose if I used the .el files instead of the compiled .elc versions. Or perhaps my assumption is incorrect? Is it ok to just byte-compile all of the .el files manually? I'm still very new to org-mode so please forgive my ignorance. Will On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Trevor Murphy wrote: > Bruno Bigras writes: > > It would be nice if the ELPA package could be updated faster than that in >> cases like this. I guess a couple of people must now have a broken org-mode >> unless they switched to git like I did. >> > > Chiming in with an alternative that I was pleased to discover - > https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/org.html. For those who want an easy way > to roll back to the 8/25 snapshot. > -- > Trevor Murphy > GnuPG Key: 0x83881C0A > > > --001a11c12514bd364005023421d5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Trevor,

Thanks so much for mentioni= ng this.=C2=A0 I considered using these to roll back to 8/25 but I wasn'= ;t sure how much performance I would lose if I=C2=A0 used the .el files ins= tead of the compiled .elc versions.=C2=A0 Or perhaps my assumption is incor= rect?=C2=A0 Is it ok to just byte-compile all of the .el files manually?=C2= =A0 I'm still very new to org-mode so please forgive my ignorance.

Will


On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Trevor Murphy = <trevor.m= .murphy@gmail.com> wrote:
Bruno Bigras <bigras.bruno@gmail.com= > writes:

It would be nice if the ELPA package could be updated faster than that in c= ases like this. I guess a couple of people must now have a broken org-mode = unless they switched to git like I did.

Chiming in with an alternative that I was pleased to discover - https://elpa.gnu.= org/packages/org.html.=C2=A0 For those who want an easy way to r= oll back to the 8/25 snapshot.
--
Trevor Murphy
GnuPG Key: 0x83881C0A



--001a11c12514bd364005023421d5--