From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Git repository is up. Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 22:19:35 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20141113031255.GA21938@thyrsus.com> <5464317A.7090001@cs.ucla.edu> <20141113050153.GA25055@thyrsus.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11346a2e7491f60507b6a82f X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415855990 27096 80.91.229.3 (13 Nov 2014 05:19:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 05:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Eggert , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: esr@thyrsus.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 13 06:19:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xomoq-0004HC-PN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 06:19:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57877 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xomoq-0007VA-2n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:19:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40243) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xomon-0007V5-0K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:19:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xomoi-0003Fp-UP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:19:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::234]:54227) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xomoi-0003Fb-Id for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:19:36 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id z11so3749365lbi.39 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:19:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=cfAxK58rcVXl/J+a1u8qe5Yrk9F9F6YlPyB6iNjYOME=; b=PGTyPcdyMp7k+pj3k/NUwjPiDX0rXT0OLdNCqEqCWr6w7DeqxiELojxEPlZIA2QHpk HQMLRPhcZ3MUXzKkLQfVLAace6wM/8f+DOZEEsBki4cQKTwMGbw1jboIpmH0Syvrg70Z cOrwJDVteaafE3NgpvjlcErD13LdZlb9bNAAq3FDUYYfsN1xY+4QQHPScZdftKRDZ9xM VA2pe8l5svd36mQ84dCAm4KAha1QnGofgFK0hnCn6OpQ//1/eszNICQojS8/hXcOTjsK wn+Gr4NFq9Be+MeHjCcp4M/AhJ5Uy8QoMokJciR8+5/dxvsoaLjAgCUhxJfT1dMUFJUY Uu/w== X-Received: by 10.152.203.196 with SMTP id ks4mr140583lac.51.1415855975205; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:19:35 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.152.113.4 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:19:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20141113050153.GA25055@thyrsus.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:176875 Archived-At: --001a11346a2e7491f60507b6a82f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I noticed a few references to bzr revisions are still in the history. They all refer to merges from the emacs-24 branch. I am not sure if it worth fixing though. git log --online, press '/' to search and search for 'emacs-24'. Example: git rev 0121d32 On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Paul Eggert : > > Thanks a lot for doing the conversion. > > > > A problem I noticed: the last two commits in the trunk bzr (118359 > > and 118360) are not in the git master branch. Similarly, the last > > commit in the emacs-24 bzr (117703, a backport) is not in the git > > emacs-24 branch. Perhaps one last pass to apply these last-second > > bzr changes to the git version? Or should we ask the authors of > > those patches to reapply them? > > That "last pass" would cost a minimum of temn hours of repo downtime. > I'm willing to do that if we find problems with the converted history > that have to be surgically corrected, but fotr this it would be less > work to just grab the patches from bzr and apply them. > > Sorry. I suspect I dropped those two commits while I was trying to > bring the transition-day patch up to date. > -- > Eric S. Raymond > > --001a11346a2e7491f60507b6a82f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I noticed a few references to bzr revisions are still in t= he history. They all refer to merges from the emacs-24 branch. I am not sur= e if it worth fixing though.

git log --online, press = 9;/' to search and search for 'emacs-24'.

<= div>Example: git rev 0121d32

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Eric S. Raymond <es= r@thyrsus.com> wrote:
Paul = Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>= :
> Thanks a lot for doing the conversion.
>
> A problem I noticed: the last two commits in the trunk bzr (118359
> and 118360) are not in the git master branch.=C2=A0 Similarly, the las= t
> commit in the emacs-24 bzr (117703, a backport) is not in the git
> emacs-24 branch.=C2=A0 Perhaps one last pass to apply these last-secon= d
> bzr changes to the git version?=C2=A0 Or should we ask the authors of<= br> > those patches to reapply them?

That "last pass" would cost a minimum of temn hours of repo downt= ime.
I'm willing to do that if we find problems with the converted history that have to be surgically corrected, but fotr this it would be less
work to just grab the patches from bzr and apply them.

Sorry.=C2=A0 I suspect I dropped those two commits while I was trying to bring the transition-day patch up to date.
--
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 <a href=3D"= http://www.catb.org= /~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>


--001a11346a2e7491f60507b6a82f--