Re: Opportunistic GC

[Pip Cet <pipcet@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 6:22 AM Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
>   > I suspect we wouldn't want to use `fork` literally, but rather something
>   > like Linux's `clone` so as to have more control about what is
>   > really shared.
>
> I see a potential problem: maybe not all current or future supported
> platforms have this feature.

Do you mean `fork' or `clone'? If it's the latter, we can just use
`fork' and miss out on a very slight optimization. If you think there
are platforms which don't support an efficient `fork'  (WebAssembly
doesn't; you have to make a full eager copy of the heap yourself) but
where we want to do the `fork' trick anyway, I don't see how. I think
those platforms will just have to continue using synchronous GC.
Which, of course, is not going away: this feature is useful in some
situations, I hope, but it should by no means be mandatory.

Pip