On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:48 PM Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
> Joseph Mingrone <jrm@ftfl.ca> writes:
> > I think the problem was introduced before 9b4a2dd (2021-02-14).  That
> > was the last snapshot that I was running and I'm pretty sure I saw the
> > problem then.  If I can find time tonight, I'll try to confirm that.
>
> Great; bisecting this would be very helpful.

Absolutely.

> Pip Cet <pipcet@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I can reproduce it, three, but I can also reproduce it with the change
> > I think you're referring to reverted.
>
> Sorry about that; it was a stab in the dark using the "the one who
> touched it last" principle.  :-/

Not a problem at all. In fact, I've taken a look and it seems
byte-optimize-form-code-walker simply ignores the value form in a
defvar now..

So I suspect it's commit 83983b6b7a115474572973b62eb5e42251713e63, I'm
cc'ing Mattias, and I suspect this patch might help (but I've only
done one quick test).

Pip