From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Mastro Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: CC mode 5.33 does not work on Emacs 24.5.1 for Mac Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:20:52 -0700 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474478522 12419 195.159.176.226 (21 Sep 2016 17:22:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 17:22:02 +0000 (UTC) To: "help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 21 19:21:58 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bmlDP-0001S7-KS for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 19:21:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46047 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmlDN-0005Qe-Vk for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:21:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45684) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmlCv-0005PW-Ov for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:21:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmlCr-0002fB-Sp for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:21:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231]:35390) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmlCr-0002f2-Gc for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:21:13 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id u82so64077776ywc.2 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:21:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=LL5xiHmdF0vVzZKulFysTXUUhx0aogmlwNvspwHy504=; b=001tVJOGIICTTnwEVxpEhT7bBRMRABdMY6/UzHwbkMu9lk6YFdYttHdFB8tH+ShQVN riPFNrnFf8bu7okXcuSQmb3xA9q6Rdy0OdkQOpVlEB0XuLoaUqpA0U3IDF5IjBNVC3Rv iiTnD7j/lRBFehay+UwmYa3oaW3AQJvviW01AWyJNN7FhW7WsejzvsSJBq6s79wrm3XO Yp0ywiV1FgDfgbMCBx25/ZcaX+o0E7nKIBRvcaps4MNVu1qnxTnUn2aaNJh0r8JB8PR7 Jlqfuj9IubNw0YOf0gnHtKpnoXJU7cJtqo+GlJmA83394+G5oSoKhEe9ZVtnKHzlPqrE QU3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=LL5xiHmdF0vVzZKulFysTXUUhx0aogmlwNvspwHy504=; b=PA0Nc6XJQasrI075GQOs1PJEiSU6fQ5LlhTDJYIqQjCJUFNNC78zMIUDVBZDJCnzzf XLu4OaTq7l1CETi3WKV4kGUcpE1HGQ6wEH9rd4HX4dwYnF2wH/T5bIL650vy9m84tn23 MyLkvu/ehZ/MS3XrsSjdSguk44vj0BBYoYOKf3ltVfKGoUfGcW8LezpRidleIL5ZIOjN 9q6UjvQIhoDWb3w5n1TR4bp05jCgoA1GQ1yX/JqTo7zlW2MEhyFB6nTy0yV0IEX8Soq0 J/rJlRyPa14DGmzXFoL8e9elKMM32epGuUGdzW587jkYpykayMLmk7YASwBSbdd/m5Mn gwnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPil6+8u1LHqQ+v3LbPOv7k6NhaE/iOTjYMTiG946h4CA9OxkrvuoSYks2Y+EHxCzwhRLk02LCYTaVcfw== X-Received: by 10.129.164.139 with SMTP id b133mr35076673ywh.86.1474478472812; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:21:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.37.58.71 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:111369 Archived-At: Juha Nieminen wrote: >> I suggest you report this as a bug with M-x report-emacs-bug. The >> maintainers of both Emacs and CC-mode monitor reports there. > > I did that. They have no idea. > >> Other than that, invoke M-x toggle-debug-on-error and then repeat the >> recipe so you get a backtrace. That will show what chain of calls lead >> to the error (and would be a good thing to include in the bug report, if >> you file one). > > I also did that. And they still didn't have any idea. What was the bug number? I wanted to see if I could find any hints but couldn't find the email by searching for your name. > For what it's worth, here's the output: > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument stringp nil) > signal(wrong-type-argument (stringp nil)) > byte-code("\210\302 @ A\"\207" [start err signal] 3) > c-syntactic-re-search-forward(nil nil t t) > c-forward-<>-arglist-recur(nil) After the error occurs, what's the value of `c-<>-notable-chars-re' in that buffer? John