From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alex Hanif Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12635: A usability issue with the save dialog box Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 10:02:08 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502b03bc2a5dc04cbec394b X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1350121451 28579 80.91.229.3 (13 Oct 2012 09:44:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 09:44:11 +0000 (UTC) To: 12635@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 13 11:44:18 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TMyGX-0002VX-Oo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 11:44:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34456 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TMyGR-0007oI-0P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 05:44:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42533) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TMyGO-0007oD-Hj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 05:44:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TMyGN-0004mx-GK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 05:44:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60052) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TMyGN-0004mr-CB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 05:44:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TMyHG-0002rj-2W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 05:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alex Hanif Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 09:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 12635 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.135012146210939 (code B ref -1); Sat, 13 Oct 2012 09:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2012 09:44:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42070 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TMyGa-0002qM-TS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 05:44:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45084) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TMwh3-00085J-3a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 04:03:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TMwg4-00031X-Bl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 04:02:33 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:42423) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TMwg4-00031T-8d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 04:02:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45356) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TMwg3-0000XD-D1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 04:02:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TMwg2-00031C-AX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 04:02:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:63591) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TMwg2-000318-4E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 04:02:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id gg4so2272975wgb.30 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 01:02:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=43w/Y19jiFAH1q7FtdYlZGaqMYITLRPL0p/7g6oWJDU=; b=x0jrqGcddXAg+Fay/FUpITTtbaYjkf8xCkywX/5tUDRIgV4qDzOCOuf8MsIEOwiv6e CMGt01CRpQlTnFKXiS1oelKc8RfL0W8YxiL7KIZGPBGRWb/EH+KI4aebGfwpv09VFPBQ mwluPdJ6SdFZLFHO+3nGP89+gNU/CSfXl2rEwNPl9VpBSoNIJEzjzMN3EmYZb73OOx91 HTVElZJtyJAh4eO2bSSJE/pRTKFn1gwl3R4u+xga0a6eylyZ54oKkQSC5adxXDskLWyC 3scSQaX4/ccCgvNXFexOi/d5UNbG7m6K1l39QQngczD4BkaN1p/Kx13/+21NoFB3LJ3U jGLQ== Original-Received: by 10.216.198.80 with SMTP id u58mr3638307wen.204.1350115348620; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 01:02:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.216.245.79 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 01:02:08 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 05:44:19 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:65554 Archived-At: --00504502b03bc2a5dc04cbec394b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I am a usability designer based in Stockholm and I would like to suggest a few improvements to the Emacs save dialog. I have motivated my suggestion and put up an image of the suggested solution on my blog: http://user.wordpress.com/2012/10/13/emacs-has-a-confusing-save-dialogue-box/ Please let me know if I can help improve Emacs. Thank you, +Alex --00504502b03bc2a5dc04cbec394b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,
I am a usability designer based in Stockholm and I would like to su= ggest a few improvements to the Emacs save dialog. I have motivated my sugg= estion and put up an image of the suggested solution on my blog:=A0 http://user.wordpress.com/2012/10/13/emacs-has-a-confusing-s= ave-dialogue-box/=A0
Please let me know if I can help improve= Emacs.
Thank you,
+Alex
--00504502b03bc2a5dc04cbec394b--