From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Spencer Baugh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Updating *Completions* as you type Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:21:47 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87bkd3z9bi.fsf@catern.com> <86v89ws5t3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86v89vzf1o.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87pm03jn3w.fsf@catern.com> <861qcjw3ch.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86r0ki2on3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86leao519y.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87fs0wk5oq.fsf@catern.com> <86edgfin4v.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87o7fhixzv.fsf@catern.com> <86o7fhy9ae.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87v89ohc6f.fsf@catern.com> <86il5nhdvh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87plzuuend.fsf@catern.com> <837cm19ay3.fsf@gnu.org> <86jzq1kh7m.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <831qc993vg.fsf@gnu.org> <86jzq1t623.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83jzq07lks.fsf@gnu.org> <831qc87gq4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a10568060b4c18f4" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13221"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: juri@linkov.net, sbaugh@catern.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 29 16:54:07 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1r8Mt4-00038Z-Uj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:54:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r8MsD-0008Kh-6N; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:53:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r8MO6-0007sh-A9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:22:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mxout5.mail.janestreet.com ([64.215.233.18]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r8MO1-00044D-TG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:22:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-f71.google.com ([209.85.218.71]) by mxgoog2.mail.janestreet.com with esmtps (TLS1.3:TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.96.2) id 1r8MO0-008qFS-2m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:21:59 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-f71.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a0dd9f85966so309194466b.1 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:21:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=janestreet.com; s=google; t=1701271319; x=1701876119; darn=gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LSTUAsyYRy/KSWUwnnWoTsn8aq18/hmbA7LYo7Mi8m4=; b=x+Wi53xlfD9CH+mR0d73dXWnLjNbm1CiIhsEFulspXA3ZRSbCZI3zXb2FM2t3YaIGj msJXeIvdKRIKQ/IImBCwVkSKztlAXb09G3KRFqrIx35l+ItM95L0Vp/zbKmCH9BkHu5P K96np0Piym21KekNArqQq6LjpC1NDzDpsYMvk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701271319; x=1701876119; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=LSTUAsyYRy/KSWUwnnWoTsn8aq18/hmbA7LYo7Mi8m4=; b=SCn8sR+3PJE/f01CDrkHeO2j5V/Schz+P18bRnqGi0NUTN1A+5bO8Ke2F8xz1eZ0E4 zOpgERGjzOtbODPjJIY9cmwR/pEEA77NTJbasRorP/6jrdQqW9M+AiM5dWd+GnuT/kY9 rxv+H6KZLkh/q8Q0BstVED6MmKGp/Tvf/a+SksfxBxnh4dYWEXbD0XNiKKt7NPTNiBFI 6l/pI43yNekPn9JZuAqmvpfNanWnuquDWYCs5jeQL+ANzIBixwIQz8sngHyx66y8jER+ NZ9Ob9io2I6qTDl1lzyUWWEViyYFLJq31fDRSL09yThjSWf3NWxKsJhXAqxaORDDiOwk hQvg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxowu574fUQApKwkmhfk9T7+k/NlRx4nFRmp5fTPmV08zfT5JeJ jVozjACQyuognYM8lGfDbTRbKqovPwKJ9ouoB75S/pwm4xrIVT+9fPhk1TvybyR3E/L6OYcKn80 U16ma58PNHSVtQWa6fmffxIyrGc4= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:10c9:b0:a0c:c864:887c with SMTP id v9-20020a17090610c900b00a0cc864887cmr10672092ejv.56.1701271319141; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:21:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHgIYf9IVLNoxNYRDsLJ/96n4v2s9Py0UWUj3nGAu7eHfhuACFv5hEbVJS8qq0cdeNgGr0XYV7LEoH1mncErMU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:10c9:b0:a0c:c864:887c with SMTP id v9-20020a17090610c900b00a0cc864887cmr10672076ejv.56.1701271318884; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:21:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <831qc87gq4.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.215.233.18; envelope-from=sbaugh@janestreet.com; helo=mxout5.mail.janestreet.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:53:10 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:313365 Archived-At: --000000000000a10568060b4c18f4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 9:54=E2=80=AFAM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Spencer Baugh > > Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 09:14:05 -0500 > > Cc: Juri Linkov , Spencer Baugh , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > My problem with "history order" or "historical order" is that it could > > be confusing, since we are talking about input history. So we in fact > > saying something like "sort history in history order". > > > > Oh, no, this is about sorting completion candidates, not history. The > history is still in chronological > > order always, it's not affected by this setting. The setting just > determines whether completion > > candidates are sorted alphabetically or to match the history. > > > > So it's "sort completions in history order". > > "History order" still sounds too heavy-handed. How about "in the > order of their typing" or somesuch? > Why heavy-handed? I feel confident that more users will understand "History order" than "in the order of their typing". How about "Sorted in the order of minibuffer history"? --000000000000a10568060b4c18f4 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 9:54=E2=80=AFAM E= li Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote= :
> From: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@janestreet.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 09:14:05 -0500
> Cc: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>, Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@catern.com>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
>=C2=A0 My problem with "history order" or "historical or= der" is that it could
>=C2=A0 be confusing, since we are talking about input history.=C2=A0 So= we in fact
>=C2=A0 saying something like "sort history in history order".=
>
> Oh, no, this is about sorting completion candidates, not history. The = history is still in chronological
> order always, it's not affected by this setting. The setting just = determines whether completion
> candidates are sorted alphabetically or to match the history.
>
> So it's "sort completions in history order".

"History order" still sounds too heavy-handed.=C2=A0 How about &q= uot;in the
order of their typing" or somesuch?

Why heavy-handed?=C2=A0 I feel confident that more users will understand = "History order" than "in the order of their typing".

How about "Sorted in the order of minibuffer hi= story"?
--000000000000a10568060b4c18f4--