On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:52 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@janestreet.com>
> > Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:21:47 -0500
> > Cc: juri@linkov.net, sbaugh@catern.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> > I feel confident that more users will understand "History order" than
> "in the
> > order of their typing".
> >
> > How about "Sorted in the order of minibuffer history"?
>
> That's better, but if you are okay with that, how about "Sorted in the
> chronological order of minibuffer input"?
>

That does not mention history, so I think it's worse - how are user
supposed to know it's about history?  But I'm okay with "Sorted in
chronological order of minibuffer history".