RE: Re: [External] : Re: Adding custom providers for thingatpt.el (was: [PATCH] Add support for 'thing-at-point' to get URL at point)

[Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <paaguti@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 875 bytes --]

Jim wrote:

> At the risk of veering off-topic (I mainly care about adding
> 'bounds-of-thing-at-point-provider-alist' and
> 'forward-thing-provider-alist'), would adding a new optional STRICT
> argument to 'thing-at-point' and friends be an ok resolution for
> everyone? This argument would enable Drew's proposed behavior. That way,
> users get all the nice behavior by default just like today, and
> programmers who require strict correctness in their code also have an
> option.

1+ if STRICT means thing starting at point and without it we may need to
look for the beginning of the thing (lazy point setting)....

/PA
-- 
Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden,
Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden
Georg Kreisler

Headaches with a Juju log:
unit-basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.operation we should run
a leader-deposed hook here, but we can't yet

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1309 bytes --]