From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master fbf2ed9a64: ipv6 addresses aren't suspicious Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:56:59 +0200 Message-ID: References: <877d8bsxsy.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f8b5d105db6bbb99" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17273"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 30 11:12:08 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nZUN5-0004KV-Uw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 11:12:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42640 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nZUN4-00057W-Kf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 05:12:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50182) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nZU8u-0007u1-Mi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 04:57:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [2a00:1450:4864:20::636] (port=42682 helo=mail-ej1-x636.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nZU8s-0007EH-Uh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 04:57:28 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x636.google.com with SMTP id j15so40058338eje.9 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 01:57:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AZQ8nEu05RqYyrf0ZZ7R8bwzUISRn7XG3bXk0srGCc0=; b=qjNVsCqNsec364uiQ9o4UfPVa+dTTq4OBwyBr7/J4L6S6U3J7czk/uQLXVrRFZL4Uw Vga+NCkl0fC7Yb4NbQG4/sGIUBDAbIR770kUXFOKUysytekahHz9K75sDwxyzbSL9u6D Gn2UT90nZK4JgtTlOa8aptuQPEtg2rMcHw/Bj3JajhGChURhGdCDvPkLlvHGA7syq4Ca wUhecDNTYVxvguq6uBVv8o3nuEGOEsYv2mT0itsd+TfgOtzXs9QLYNaJ+npof0lRWZ91 hZe9MsGHZ9gc+2Yj6fO8vkHmdxQ7Eh0me94qzAZQ/pl5jPmwWrFZrYnm3YcoaSihm0Jz fctA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AZQ8nEu05RqYyrf0ZZ7R8bwzUISRn7XG3bXk0srGCc0=; b=1pAPnBG6eybwTmOrwn8DUjryI57dQAKJKKO0l55EzspvPha+0HsqhwRRt8c+3St2oX 7cteizCzqAi3vNYJI6+S7ZfilLB20SxXbUase7qXT+ve/Ta/tiQ9Nar6ltjBIqVPBdAy Bb/1lFAB5vuQVHEnZ8D2e5pIFXiZS7ZscX3tjjPw2e2QaKKS0KTkXnoyJ0x0+yj4PW0Z 7jDDwtJ4RFqbfZj0yD7FRwhK+2Xs6SfYs+9EDwKx2gXjUmmiOExCORYCyHkjqV8oBeqr bgRIYsTgxQ1nxG4b6H45p/2/nQ9F1wEVb1EOoIORi9MtJHY7Mt3pe/ejp7J9X54/my6Y siGg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530qq1vt7zikDzADgd/mEdln/w1GaRkUWH8uMju1jLTRWdgnjoMY k/wAM9erDCGpnUMoctwBVXMMc+M/dm3y1W2+tcfLdUU4OkqK9w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz86anahPq5r7v+Ipbl2znL9FSt3SyCIviakkOZCEqvO57Yw03x2Uee9znctmYkjCjEmI9ZxhikkvK+tyJnPhU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9743:b0:6d8:632a:a42d with SMTP id o3-20020a170906974300b006d8632aa42dmr39587990ejy.157.1648630645174; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 01:57:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:1450:4864:20::636 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::636; envelope-from=paaguti@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x636.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.659, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:287601 Archived-At: --000000000000f8b5d105db6bbb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" *portability* On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 10:56, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez < paaguti@gmail.com> wrote: > Lars> I am aware of this :-) > :-)) The teacher in me speaking ;-) > > How reliable is network-lookup-address-info in a partability scenario? > (Just curious...) > > /PA > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 09:29, Robert Pluim wrote: > >> >>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:26:50 +0200, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez < >> paaguti@gmail.com> said: >> >> Robert> but ":1" is not a valid IPv4 nor IPv6 address. >> Pedro> However "::1" is valid, as would be "FC01::33", The :: stands >> for all >> Pedro> zeros. >> Pedro> This for IPv6 _addresses_. >> >> I am aware of this :-) >> >> Pedro> IPv6 _prefixes_ conform to ([0-9-a-fA-F]{1,4}:)+:/[0-9]+ >> >> And this. Lars is checking for IP addresses here, not prefixes, hence >> my suggestion to use `network-lookup-address-info' (which is a thin >> veneer over getaddrinfo(3)). >> >> Robert >> -- >> > > > -- > Fragen sind nicht da um beantwortet zu werden, > Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden > Georg Kreisler > > Headaches with a Juju log: > unit-basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.operation we should run > a leader-deposed hook here, but we can't yet > > -- Fragen sind nicht da um beantwortet zu werden, Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden Georg Kreisler Headaches with a Juju log: unit-basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.operation we should run a leader-deposed hook here, but we can't yet --000000000000f8b5d105db6bbb99 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
*portability*

On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 10:56, Pedro Andre= s Aranda Gutierrez <paaguti@gmail.c= om> wrote:
Lars>=20 I am aware of this :-)
:-)) The teacher in me speaking ;-)
<= div>
How reliable is network-lookup-address-info in a partabi= lity scenario? (Just curious...)

/PA

On W= ed, 30 Mar 2022 at 09:29, Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2= 022 07:26:50 +0200, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <paaguti@gmail.com> said:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Robert> but ":1" is not a valid IPv4 nor IPv6 ad= dress.
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Pedro> However "::1" is valid, as would be "= ;FC01::33", The :: stands for all
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Pedro> zeros.
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Pedro> This for IPv6 _addresses_.

I am aware of this :-)

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Pedro> IPv6 _prefixes_ conform to ([0-9-a-fA-F]{1,4}:)+:/[= 0-9]+

And this. Lars is checking for IP addresses here, not prefixes, hence
my suggestion to use `network-lookup-address-info' (which is a thin
veneer over getaddrinfo(3)).

Robert
--


--
Fragen sind nicht da um beantworte= t zu werden,
Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden
Georg K= reisler

Headaches with a Juju log:
unit-= basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.operation we should run a lea= der-deposed hook here, but we can't yet



--
Fragen sin= d nicht da um beantwortet zu werden,
Fragen sind da um gestellt zu= werden
Georg Kreisler

Headaches with a J= uju log:
unit-basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.opera= tion we should run a leader-deposed hook here, but we can't yet

=
--000000000000f8b5d105db6bbb99--