Re: master fbf2ed9a64: ipv6 addresses aren't suspicious

[Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <paaguti@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1499 bytes --]

*portability*

On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 10:56, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <
paaguti@gmail.com> wrote:

> Lars> I am aware of this :-)
> :-)) The teacher in me speaking ;-)
>
> How reliable is network-lookup-address-info in a partability scenario?
> (Just curious...)
>
> /PA
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 09:29, Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:26:50 +0200, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <
>> paaguti@gmail.com> said:
>>
>>     Robert> but ":1" is not a valid IPv4 nor IPv6 address.
>>     Pedro> However "::1" is valid, as would be "FC01::33", The :: stands
>> for all
>>     Pedro> zeros.
>>     Pedro> This for IPv6 _addresses_.
>>
>> I am aware of this :-)
>>
>>     Pedro> IPv6 _prefixes_ conform to ([0-9-a-fA-F]{1,4}:)+:/[0-9]+
>>
>> And this. Lars is checking for IP addresses here, not prefixes, hence
>> my suggestion to use `network-lookup-address-info' (which is a thin
>> veneer over getaddrinfo(3)).
>>
>> Robert
>> --
>>
>
>
> --
> Fragen sind nicht da um beantwortet zu werden,
> Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden
> Georg Kreisler
>
> Headaches with a Juju log:
> unit-basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.operation we should run
> a leader-deposed hook here, but we can't yet
>
>

-- 
Fragen sind nicht da um beantwortet zu werden,
Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden
Georg Kreisler

Headaches with a Juju log:
unit-basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.operation we should run
a leader-deposed hook here, but we can't yet

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2639 bytes --]