From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: chad Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.tangents Subject: Re: Ligature support Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 13:29:19 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87cznths5j.fsf@gnus.org> <87wnlwyox9.fsf@gnus.org> <83lf2cq7n5.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnlnkxbo.fsf@gnus.org> <83cznfdohr.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgqik9bk.fsf@gnus.org> <83v916d64z.fsf@gnu.org> <878ry2k6qz.fsf@gnus.org> <83tugqd488.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgqiiq8c.fsf@gnus.org> <83r1bud3or.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1buipf5.fsf@gnus.org> <83o86yd0ig.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6iiimay.fsf@gnus.org> <83fssact8i.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0hmgre3.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmrdamcw.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000521f7f05d13f16eb" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14755"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-tangents@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-tangents-bounces+get-emacs-tangents=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 20 22:29:55 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: get-emacs-tangents@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1moXvm-0003c6-2U for get-emacs-tangents@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 22:29:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49812 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1moXvk-0002qj-CL for get-emacs-tangents@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 16:29:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59868) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1moXvU-0002qY-BV for emacs-tangents@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 16:29:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a00:1450:4864:20::12e] (port=42770 helo=mail-lf1-x12e.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1moXvS-0007rU-Om; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 16:29:36 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id t26so60409842lfk.9; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 13:29:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Hi4+yRwyc643yi4UuJZBZJsiHZ7qLBRlM4TZ6BnFA+Q=; b=I7MnELaI/kAbD5o9oIw5uAFsXh3FWLw0XUr51Tvx3vSoklvuHE6ynVdiocL+7QfEbW 2Z6g9sQMxRTStnETbCuEyQ1fPLcsFnrbEE6nbWQga3RQjZzKPxFAM2ZvSS8tTVvQf8Q4 0MVEYMXMzhSZx/c7uoQ7lpZnBpu5312DRiqa8IwEfH9P6y2kGJTtSMZ1aAqXTi+HFzwe ZyxgyiMFb5eswn27xRRwnCTHxNZiD5eDbCLSZbR6bAB1RUpgE3n4p8airExXB+c4zGng 2YAw5dSpOAPxgLiQTMysVl/dF+QB1zrg2slv4+NCjLFB8dOzTa7M/tQLY8Kg1ix5RSjL q1dg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Hi4+yRwyc643yi4UuJZBZJsiHZ7qLBRlM4TZ6BnFA+Q=; b=hmmdVlJmAxyjlpXRIZqtDWzEFs/oQWZaafXDMKfkhWNzsRy0rgo4EMFneesSBq2rZc c3L2zglrfieQhqsp98dQv+5lmlKAauzY9SRnB6W+n4QHOPDPAa3jSzeerFz/5RW8oRVi IosMugEbY4v4bVfkaSy86kzd3GKIZIggwSX/vPvtIybIuXHP1A8Xr95yqXXCNb2n2hOU 8KQto3r0TE/0JDvu3zgY5fpXSaM6PADJBQODZwg3+dgwCGNzN9mmlsTsDaEEnogI3Lmy 06hQqmj1qBZKTpi16W9NrhAKsV636hC2CnaSYzx5b4YcgGLoiT//EfEdJ+bJw8ls/MT9 2tZg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532lbuVCkZuV3awi12BgpMst4tvy/4d3CdDK68WvtxeoSeqYqVf0 EpLygpHQoAWSev5x7OpgpdOg6meDWBaj+l1JkUNFxp6wG4E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxYWM7jizG9/lZj0EWBzVWEYLQBB1R7dbs5fEQc7s0RemhVWS7+scSYFr4MeCaH8ssfSpJuzlzbz7pyjzh05nA= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b4a6:: with SMTP id q6mr36439280ljm.7.1637443771177; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 13:29:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:1450:4864:20::12e (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::12e; envelope-from=yandros@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x12e.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-tangents@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs news and miscellaneous discussions outside the scope of other Emacs mailing lists List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-tangents-bounces+get-emacs-tangents=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-tangents" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.tangents:752 Archived-At: --000000000000521f7f05d13f16eb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:39 PM Richard Stallman wrote: > Is all the material available in a way that avoids the SIL font license? > It is better to avoid that if possible. Out of curiosity, what makes the SIL licence something to be avoided? The GNU project licenses list (https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html) doesn't mention anything that makes me think it should be avoided, and in fact it suggests to me that the SIL license is one of the better choices. (This is largely academic to me at this point, but in my other work-life, we almost released some content-specific icons as part of a font, so I looked a bit to make sure that there was reasonable libre license, and SIL seemed to be a reasonable choice. If something changed or I missed something, I'm interested.) Thanks in advance, ~Chad --000000000000521f7f05d13f16eb Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:39 PM Rich= ard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:<= br>
Is all the mater= ial available in a way that avoids the SIL font license?
It is better to avoid that if possible.

=C2= =A0Out of curiosity, what makes the SIL licence something to be avoided? Th= e GNU project licenses list (https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html) does= n't mention anything that makes me think it should be avoided, and in f= act it suggests to me that the SIL license is one of the better choices.=C2= =A0=C2=A0

(This is largely academic to me at this = point, but in my other work-life, we almost released some content-specific = icons as part of a font, so I looked a bit to make sure that there was reas= onable libre license, and SIL seemed to be a reasonable choice. If somethin= g changed or I missed something, I'm interested.)

<= div>Thanks in advance,
~Chad

--000000000000521f7f05d13f16eb--