From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ian Perryman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23842: 24.4; Runaway background process Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:02:22 -0400 Message-ID: References: <576F977E.8060405@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1146cb903e85490536330b4a X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466967804 2970 80.91.229.3 (26 Jun 2016 19:03:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 19:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 23842@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 26 21:03:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bHFKu-0007jh-QH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 21:03:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54946 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHFKq-0007gz-TP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:03:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45531) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHFKk-0007gq-Cu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:03:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHFKg-0005ZR-3L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:03:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHFKg-0005ZM-03 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHFKf-00079k-IM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:03:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ian Perryman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 19:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23842 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23842-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23842.146696775027471 (code B ref 23842); Sun, 26 Jun 2016 19:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23842) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2016 19:02:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57051 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHFKA-000791-7M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:02:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com ([209.85.161.176]:34296) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHFK8-00078p-SG for 23842@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:02:29 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yw0-f176.google.com with SMTP id i12so136681077ywa.1 for <23842@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:02:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xtreme-eda-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=H57q6lLt83HQLF9jqjrhdfYCNnIlgDywrLJvnYiXXIQ=; b=DOjyRwGfoq2ZFm58xhugdE4UG8d3ElH+tYQBxW2Fo86IRtc+wKmyTD2yB7Il/hN9TI 2y0B9aOVS3L3ah5d2iRxahzOJuogXAD2QelkPyHm5M6fm8UI5fuuQPFkwCKWGWF8HS0I Tuodnfy6zxLlKLkBJ2J+qFZ8Be3F+L30Cj23yfPY0elWCjjJjN550cW5eRI4Hq8/SbSV xeL1966LrqjsdSYS/d+nzQdakak1o23ZjFepn/l1imTb1DdcNVAgXTqtg73BfjnxIdJb aPIFDXZhFN/BX4V6oY/oCWRJdnZ3J12Re0hyVb27TGARnUITVbQMB3XCYg1CW8kkHPwg opvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=H57q6lLt83HQLF9jqjrhdfYCNnIlgDywrLJvnYiXXIQ=; b=R/HLYHYPaEQUnMANAHpYUUiGJHbyBFNg0pU5Z0zhj6WPHdXiMUtUzIrH6yQzUrLY8Q W0f7WkvzFnu+JuT+03OzRrAzHRLGUqXOTGKrRl41k8IZ75lyzjrlennynPykhokQfnZb VjMq9I4Ee60kS5eMFasRrUvPcgE/Bzb4OjjEjqz2jh8avWzgOcGS+SjxW/9rOl4/WPG1 4uWq6UfwlKrTo0JYbVs4bZutnUoueieNTrIj0EWVsmOMlleFypmYsHTU8EppIThOLO7I ttdGngGF/Bc/trDvOcTR91uiHqlomfzKGlj7e2N1wuwMd0/pMyyI5tZa5hyOS/M1vFS8 kSNw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJPEN8oA7p0qbrX6gsMZ6z3Xfy59duvGWu8mZhPjQzjzNVk5kRTRbW9hgpX6mtKiHwvVw9nL47520ciF5iR X-Received: by 10.37.50.150 with SMTP id y144mr8912839yby.17.1466967743417; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.129.155.8 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:02:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:120113 Archived-At: --001a1146cb903e85490536330b4a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Not sure but it sounds like all development is on emacs 25 which is not available yet AFAIK. If the bug was fixed, is there a patch for emacs 24 that I can use? When was the bug introduced? Should I downgrade to an earlier version of emacs that does not have the bug? Thanks, Ian On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Glenn Morris wrote: > > I don't understand why this was closed, when everyone agrees that the > command fails in the current sources. It happens to fail in a different > way to the original report, but so what? There's still obviously a bug. > --001a1146cb903e85490536330b4a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Not sure but it sounds like all development is on emacs 25= which is not available yet AFAIK.=C2=A0 If the bug was fixed, is there a p= atch for emacs 24 that I can use?=C2=A0 When was the bug introduced?=C2=A0 = Should I downgrade to an earlier version of emacs that does not have the bu= g?

Thanks,
Ian

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Glen= n Morris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote:
I don't understand why this was closed, when everyone agrees that the command fails in the current sources.=C2=A0 It happens to fail in a differe= nt
way to the original report, but so what? There's still obviously a bug.=

--001a1146cb903e85490536330b4a--