From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Josh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14708: 24.2; query-replace-regexp when match and replacement are the same Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 07:59:26 -0700 Message-ID: References: <7E039918541B4C4183BFDB8F015C74300E8E80@WCL-EXCH02.wcl.local> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372172478 18423 80.91.229.3 (25 Jun 2013 15:01:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:01:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ed Avis , 14708@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 25 17:01:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UrUk9-0003z3-Gd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:01:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58621 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrUk8-0001EF-Uq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:01:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47554) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrUk3-0001CG-BN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:01:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrUju-0003B3-OT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:01:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46250) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrUju-0003Az-M9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UrUju-0005bB-AC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Josh Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14708 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14708-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14708.137217241021380 (code B ref 14708); Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14708) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2013 15:00:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40565 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UrUj2-0005Yj-Kn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:00:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qe0-f45.google.com ([209.85.128.45]:33370) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UrUiw-0005XS-Dr for 14708@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:00:03 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qe0-f45.google.com with SMTP id w7so601949qeb.32 for <14708@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 07:59:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=V0iKObn5gRlF5imtQaxWJAOLSI1Yi10K2fgcWB6uQew=; b=lko/wPABeL/1pyg9+fPQ7wpNPrMVIaoGfh7fMyICqn+8I3cmFMgd2ms62GPl8w8wfB F5EJjZUP0JpcNpQIyGM7jTAcfzme7xzX/zXsQsEK6N0fcIFTDuNS6AIH2kx4h8UfUOhM Q2AmnOV/zD4a8ncxRy6OH3ii708SZzjHY2AOLqK/2h3xnknMbm7QvUtDXom1/2hy66jr aHdzKB6BUcLzR1GyF3UjZnCv/0kvb+IHS7LdqBaLgr7kX4yMsVQ1XrCXgiQHPgTU/TlK iWmWqiggII/CZdHDqsqeWfv4RGq46oV0gAW45k6NN8nm6vYPnsLdzeEy5lG8VgZYYDmC 6j1A== X-Received: by 10.224.188.74 with SMTP id cz10mr318556qab.31.1372172396250; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 07:59:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.49.35.206 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 07:59:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: nDnmR-H6DwXdO7ftNi8BGsxhBnc X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmAvztU9IZg30nz6btrJv4tXmWiWMwQeJlXMWOjPd9SbQifIzfyv6+lepaCO1nIxLthF2/G X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:75565 Archived-At: On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> I don't think the difference is very important, but I wouldn't oppose >>> such a change. >> Did you read the point I made above and which the reporter conceded, namely >> that such no-op replacements often indicate broken regexps? > > I did. And just like the improvement he proposes, this downside > is minor. I don't think either of the arguments justifies spending > time on a patch, I don't understand what you mean here. I see one argument (the reporter's) in favor of some form of patch and one argument (mine) in favor of no change whatsoever to the current behavior.