From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Josh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Finding packages to enable by default Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:37:10 -0800 Message-ID: References: <8761ra7uq3.fsf@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149422474c27904ecd70b01 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386308275 3622 80.91.229.3 (6 Dec 2013 05:37:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 05:37:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andrew Hyatt , Tom , Bozhidar Batsov , emacs-devel To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 06 06:37:59 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Voo6w-0007V4-26 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 06:37:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57428 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Voo6v-0002Wu-6B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:37:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60290) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Voo6n-0002WQ-RR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:37:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Voo6g-0007N7-PU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:37:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:42440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Voo6g-0007Mx-Io for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:37:42 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id x12so187337wgg.16 for ; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 21:37:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=+qJ6a9b6AVnTWhzI9lrkMqzUT9ZYLIichpO1rzzERMk=; b=D8QZ0KilburUN3ftf+e5EWsPamj1+i3qSxBRSyGkNaZ4dus6wYJE08C6YA5NClbzCo 5IJQFbmR8laa4S0mvlKTWWiqaKgsIoESmRlkIS6HHYDKqS38Q3x5+XEJkW1imJOzle9m ooqABBUSI9tB72lsvZM90OWcjmfUS341adX5mJwCWKPZXzZtEZcvaVESnWllzXEtdK4K Exzkq7l/NTSaSEmk2YYeR3XRibHQd+M6zEc8rmhMESuktNgF5EzFSW41/yIRL441z/uJ CVsAm/2ngG9Z2tOoqks+KF+BsWIPlce5FZIyDhT+6TTXbpa0cwezMOU3QbAJlF1CXKPD v1lg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkZn7hEhd9OgVROH69AR7uRNJwKKaD9lfKeOqeP7X56P8CqVHEOJUBoVRXlJGBCL2R+ePb3 X-Received: by 10.194.237.99 with SMTP id vb3mr1315032wjc.28.1386308261160; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 21:37:41 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.194.24.7 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:37:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: QVrhgkRvFtWyQoB1QfxJwhUQYzM X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 74.125.82.49 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:166148 Archived-At: --089e0149422474c27904ecd70b01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> dired-x > > No opinion on this one (I basically don't use dired). > Is there any reason why dired-x and/or dired-aux could not be integrated with dired proper? Together they provide a good deal of useful functionality, but I was oblivious to their existence for quite a long time because their constituent functions and variables did not appear among the results of my documentation searches. --089e0149422474c27904ecd70b01 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Stefan Monnier <= monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>> dired-x

No opinion on this one (I basically don't use dired).
<= div>
Is there any reason why dired-x and/or dired-aux could n= ot be integrated
with=A0dired proper?=A0 Together they provide a = good deal of useful functionality,=A0
but I was oblivious to their existence for quite a long time because t= heir=A0
constituent functions and variables did not appear among = the results of my=A0
documentation searches.

--089e0149422474c27904ecd70b01--