On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> dired-x > > No opinion on this one (I basically don't use dired). > Is there any reason why dired-x and/or dired-aux could not be integrated with dired proper? Together they provide a good deal of useful functionality, but I was oblivious to their existence for quite a long time because their constituent functions and variables did not appear among the results of my documentation searches.