From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CL package serious deficiencies Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 22:29:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <33271707.post@talk.nabble.com> <87fwemcwlx.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87zkcubbfc.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87vcnibb9t.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87r4y6bams.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328650222 1949 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2012 21:30:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: egnarts-ms , Stefan Monnier , Drew Adams , Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Nix Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 07 22:30:21 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RuscB-0007hB-Ad for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:30:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33005 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuscA-0006HB-Qe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:30:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:32791) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rusc4-0006Eq-Ev for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:30:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rusc0-0001Cm-6L for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:30:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:52286) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rusbz-0001Az-LS for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:30:04 -0500 Original-Received: by lamf4 with SMTP id f4so5412803lam.0 for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:30:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=64O0nlFjy0+xG+dpyQEtqXk9L8mqImzi+47QAfHS4SY=; b=NLDLvf3If40tckipzSzg6ZKjJZTCSO4jauALO8IcvJu1IHJ9AJC794Zssz/p5f2jTI LhwaRxmh6ZIn9eMrjKZolPf8i2z6p694aBBDBhivlPxn3FEfWibGNh/TTHooSPYP9oJK bihvRTR8jZqtgwgrmb1ZNZ+Ymzx2kfx2DqOjE= Original-Received: by 10.152.148.9 with SMTP id to9mr6493550lab.1.1328650201145; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:30:01 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.12.6 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 13:29:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87r4y6bams.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.215.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148320 Archived-At: On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:23, Nix wrote: > On 7 Feb 2012, Lennart Borgman spake thusly: > > > So as a result, if one of us wants to use `cadr' in ordinary Lisp > functions that are part of Emacs, we can, but if we want to use `caddr', > we can't. Now does that restriction make any sense at all? I'd say it I am using caddr quite a lot. Without any whining byte-compiler or other problems... ;-)