From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: face vs. mouse-face text property Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:40:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87pqegeluf.fsf@web.de> <87y5t2f7q0.fsf@web.de> <83vco52wph.fsf@gnu.org> <87bopv8jla.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327333290 4313 80.91.229.12 (23 Jan 2012 15:41:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 23 16:41:26 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RpM1M-0006OH-D0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:41:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53378 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpM1L-0003e1-Qw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:41:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50372) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpM1F-0003cV-AL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:41:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpM19-0003c0-FZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:41:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:59490) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpM12-0003aa-Np; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:41:04 -0500 Original-Received: by lagw12 with SMTP id w12so2066326lag.0 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:41:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=9uuGTm5CQeNoWnCAaSvkJQJdOJByT4xtmYBDYA3aIeE=; b=A4tLpZLxu0/F+x0n4bFHpbP5Y1nP+aNat2QbnG7Ksvo/oqpwr5U7wipywkJJcpuPrW MLE9o9DwySMoanwYo//zY+F56gIg3FNwH7IJ/siZ4Mq1Fhatii56DvefGV9Wnd7Bd+vC eVtXvVsN+jTWjyeL8ABIbAWgWN0CYyrf/4a08= Original-Received: by 10.152.131.40 with SMTP id oj8mr4637955lab.24.1327333263645; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:41:03 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.97.11 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:40:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.215.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147853 Archived-At: On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 16:34, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>>> Therefore, I think if we want to be able to display selectable >>>> newlines, we need to have a special way to display such newlines, >>>> e.g. "" or some such. >>> I'd suggest \n rather than , since it's already used at many other >>> places in Emacs (tho it's not often visible to the "end user"). >> Why not show "\n" with a special background face? > > Which part of (propertize "\\n" 'face 'escape-glyph) makes you think > that we wouldn't want to show \n with a special background face? ;-) Sorry.