From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Merging Org 7.8.02 before Emacs 24.1 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:47:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: <877h1ncs1u.fsf@altern.org> <87ipl3g4jr.fsf@gnu.org> <87vcp3hfuh.fsf@gnu.org> <81vcp27a87.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1324982904 23584 80.91.229.12 (27 Dec 2011 10:48:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 10:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Bastien , Chong Yidong , schulte eric , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 27 11:48:16 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RfUZo-0002FE-QA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:48:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39860 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RfUZn-0003Vx-RF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 05:48:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37204) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RfUZk-0003Vg-BL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 05:48:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RfUZj-00044O-6N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 05:48:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:42540) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RfUZg-00043T-Fu; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 05:48:04 -0500 Original-Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so3005117lag.0 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 02:48:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=lCQAHi0DrKI3Mj0Btv2W1ciC6uf9moT+QP0hY5Ligpc=; b=V9fO7MeAVX9WL6pcAcJO45dnVZeZIEJxN3fMKVOJ5gQU1zcs3iNpUoqhlsc9X5Cgbu YNKawaVS3ViuKs8ztbCXU+25M2MPvVWmQjlRtzwcGfTKphIUFNAhvN5FQeV45Nse/KzF uRfyelq2OFtEPMRq+0dX4dS1tVpFoXLKoUc9c= Original-Received: by 10.152.104.6 with SMTP id ga6mr21676065lab.45.1324982882136; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 02:48:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.152.124.44 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 02:47:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <81vcp27a87.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.215.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146979 Archived-At: On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 08:19, Jambunathan K wrote: > Bastien writes: > > > Needless to say, I am for inclusion of org-odt in Emacs-24.1. I agree. I would guess that those using the exporter in org-mode would like to have it included. And I can't see why not to include it since it is much better structured and will probably give much fewer errors to take care of.