* emacs-20110822 windows binaries @ 2011-08-22 18:07 Sean Sieger 2011-08-22 22:46 ` Dani Moncayo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Sean Sieger @ 2011-08-22 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-devel; +Cc: help-emacs-windows The trunk was built and runs successfully on Windows. Binaries have been published in http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: emacs-20110822 windows binaries 2011-08-22 18:07 emacs-20110822 windows binaries Sean Sieger @ 2011-08-22 22:46 ` Dani Moncayo 2011-08-22 22:56 ` [h-e-w] " Lennart Borgman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Dani Moncayo @ 2011-08-22 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sean Sieger; +Cc: help-emacs-windows, emacs-devel On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 20:07, Sean Sieger <sean.sieger@gmail.com> wrote: > The trunk was built and runs successfully on Windows. Binaries have > been published in > > http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/ Hi Sean, Currently, you identify your builds by date (e.g. "20110822"), which is reasonable, but I wonder if it would be be even better to use the bzr revision ID instead (e.g. "r105534"). That way, we would know exactly the version we are running. Even if someone wants to know the date of the build, one easy and quick way to get it would be to look at the zip file creation date. Well, I leave here my suggestion, and thanks for your time. -- Dani Moncayo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [h-e-w] emacs-20110822 windows binaries 2011-08-22 22:46 ` Dani Moncayo @ 2011-08-22 22:56 ` Lennart Borgman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Lennart Borgman @ 2011-08-22 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dani Moncayo; +Cc: help-emacs-windows, Sean Sieger, emacs-devel On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 00:46, Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 20:07, Sean Sieger <sean.sieger@gmail.com> wrote: >> The trunk was built and runs successfully on Windows. Binaries have >> been published in >> >> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/ > > Hi Sean, > > Currently, you identify your builds by date (e.g. "20110822"), which > is reasonable, but I wonder if it would be be even better to use the > bzr revision ID instead (e.g. "r105534"). > > That way, we would know exactly the version we are running. Even if > someone wants to know the date of the build, one easy and quick way to > get it would be to look at the zip file creation date. Why not both? A long file name for the downloaded file is not a problem. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-22 22:56 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-08-22 18:07 emacs-20110822 windows binaries Sean Sieger 2011-08-22 22:46 ` Dani Moncayo 2011-08-22 22:56 ` [h-e-w] " Lennart Borgman
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.