From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10633: Please mark invalid "; !important;" in CSS Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 03:07:07 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327802889 11201 80.91.229.3 (29 Jan 2012 02:08:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10633@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 29 03:08:08 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RrKBa-0003Cv-H4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 03:08:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55919 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrKBZ-0004RB-LZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:08:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrKBX-0004R3-02 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:08:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrKBW-0000Gs-0j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39092) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrKBV-0000Gn-RI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:08:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrKBW-0006sT-Av for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10633 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10633-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10633.132780285626405 (code B ref 10633); Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10633) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2012 02:07:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42715 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrKB5-0006rq-UB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:07:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]:56738) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrKB4-0006re-5K for 10633@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:07:34 -0500 Original-Received: by lahl5 with SMTP id l5so1570735lah.3 for <10633@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:07:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=KTxQ335KHj2zXNQ7UBXp9e1HBvj9Qh95SGAiLDPSUBE=; b=ZmKeoPWgbL2L9xjB06Xkt35SZZxyM/7he9r6wHnickFnQLXWpchxr2xh4lPdvL8Nyh Y5NtsLEfKBovtdzsJM0ZpjBCQouHD5nY6nT7DPr4g1xhR2tPTFxyZhFQVb235iQr9zLE WJmuTKjpaUg6m2QliEJoMG7vOXLmb+Ku3P22M= Original-Received: by 10.152.129.226 with SMTP id nz2mr2718877lab.7.1327802847126; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:07:27 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.97.11 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:07:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56172 Archived-At: On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 03:04, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 03:00, Lennart Borgman > wrote: > >> A lot of people are writing css files, but only a few >> of them probably are using "!important" (since it is a more advanced >> concept and needed mostly in special cases). > > I've used quite a few times !important, and I've never written "XXX; > !important;". That is good, but unfortunately it does not help others.