Hello,
Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
> I'm not an expert of HTML either. However, the "p" tag inside the
> "figure" is uncommon looking a bit on the example usages online. Thus, I
> agree with Matt that it should probably not be there.
OK.
> AFAIK, the CSS selector still differs so on the output side they are not
> alike. I.e. the former is "figure>img" the other is a "p>img". Aside: If
> anything, removing the "p" tag inside the figure would make it easier to
> handle images.
So would the following patch fix the issue?