From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pierpaolo Bernardi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 07:04:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87vb98csu1.fsf@red-bean.com> <87h9kscqig.fsf@red-bean.com> <83vb98jqwp.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2poba1s.fsf@red-bean.com> <83si4cjnyw.fsf@gnu.org> <87twosp5ke.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87fv0cm64g.fsf@gmx.us> <87si4bsktk.fsf@red-bean.com> <87wptnlbl6.fsf@gmx.us> <87pozfl2ut.fsf@gmx.us> <87d1vfl17p.fsf@gmx.us> <878u63p6sh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87pozfchq6.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447394687 12426 80.91.229.3 (13 Nov 2015 06:04:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 06:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 13 07:04:42 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zx7TV-0005sf-8K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 07:04:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51179 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zx7TU-0002NT-IY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:04:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35507) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zx7TI-0002NO-1k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:04:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zx7TH-0005QL-9n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:04:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]:35301) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zx7TH-0005QA-54 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:04:27 -0500 Original-Received: by ioc74 with SMTP id 74so88358763ioc.2 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 22:04:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VMxk/B2tfm1uGoIM9upzEbBo8z45YBmcAUZ+dgnMbKg=; b=yr6HBpQw3uMEqb/7NJxvS161ke3tyEbwzP478QffPzaEyPwtem0UIxX2jPZdXmawW2 6sbx04Vu98Yeria/8yYBKYVXxLYPUfpgAeLoeE0IYNsWzP/KVS+0njac5nRQYWYZBNK8 pGCOfKOuid9q5Szc5UZuqIYD9uSfe4lZnIRgDLxdqojQYe7AwBnNL0O5rcU+U9dDaxUt xaPG6Ewsewm8MdSm6aV9WqUf0cyDKnLdILsaai7lZJH9X/gmVbWtNE3DHVg6010QjChp HA1MiWFwfxpRkFBQnAqaXHuuxZgYUsB9163tjcNPr8DQIXUXJknekT+gMviQWeWsFj9+ CO4Q== X-Received: by 10.107.137.19 with SMTP id l19mr16897623iod.138.1447394666600; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 22:04:26 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.64.232.35 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 22:04:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194317 Archived-At: Hi, On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Artur Malabarba wrote: > > On 12 Nov 2015 4:33 pm, "Pierpaolo Bernardi" wrote: >> >> In case this change passes, could you please make it possible to get >> the old behaviour easily? > > Hi Pierpaolo, > > Could you clarify exactly what you mean by old behaviour? There are lots of > behaviours going around here, so I want to make sure I know what you're > referring to. The old behaviour is: ctrl-o inserts a newline after the point, nothing else is done. If I want to reindent the next line, reindenting is only a mindless keystroke away. Fixing unwanted whitespace changes requires more effort and full attention. I'm sorry I couldn't follow the whole discussion from the start, so I'm missing what prompted the change. Cheers