Thanks

I have used edebug for developing my elisp extension.

I just feel elisp + XML + c binary for complex extension is not so
convenient. Even with edebug, when some predication failed, I should guess
where it could be then set edebug function entry.

On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
wrote:

> > When I wrote my simple extension, pure elisp code is ok. But I found it
> is
> > hard to write complex elisp extension. Because when elisp predication
> > failed (for example stringp) it hard to find out the failed predication
> > place. (no file:function:line_number or backtrace)
>
> Options => Enter Debugger on Error
>
>
>         Stefan
>