Re: A couple of things that I think should be in byte bytecode meta comments

[Rocky Bernstein <rocky@gnu.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 951 bytes --]

It is clear from both email messages you haven't been paying attention as
this has been discussed before, same as in your other email.

(I'll admit though that there has been far too many grammar mistakes in
what I wrote.)

I'm not interested in carrying the discussion further. I've been through
these kind of discussions on the same topics a couple of times before. And
I know what the solution is should I want to pursue it.

On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 3:25 AM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
wrote:

> On Dez 22 2017, Rocky Bernstein <rocky@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > Except when a project concatenates a bunch byecode files together. Also
> the
> > parent path information or lack of it can sometimes also be useful.
>
> That won't help if the files are moved.
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
> GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
> "And now for something completely different."
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1539 bytes --]