> When running go-ts-mode-test-file, it seems to match things that aren't functions like interfaces. I think we should only be matching functions, and more specifically, shouldn't we only be matching functions starting with "Test"?
> We could perhaps extend the error checking to include that as well?

I've updated the patch to include a "function_declaration" and "Test" prefix
check. I also did a minor refactoring to avoid special handling in the case when
the region is not active. I'm also attaching the updated sample file with more
scenarios for testing.

>
> For the commit message, I'm not sure we need that paragraph especially when it's already described in the news. Eli what do you think?
>
> +*** New unit test commands.
> +Two new commands are now available to run unit tests.
> Three?
>
> I'm also wondering if we should include "current" in the go-ts-mode-test-file and go-ts-mode-test-package function names. Maybe someone would expect that they would get prompted to select a file or package to test? Maybe I'm overthinking that :). Eli what do you think?

I'll wait for Eli to reply before incorporating the changes :).

Additionally, I also noticed that the emacs-30 branch is cut. I wanted
to check if I
need to rebase my patch onto master or emacs-30 branch?

--
Ankit