bug#31532: Non-capitalized CC in rmail.texi(emacs-26)

bug#31532: Non-capitalized CC in rmail.texi(emacs-26)

[Takesi Ayanokoji]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 650 bytes --]

In Emacs-26 manual(rmail.texi), some @code{CC} fixed to@{CC}.

But in rmail.texi, there still remain non-capitalized CC.

rmail.texi:756:@samp{Subject}, @samp{To}, @samp{CC}, @samp{In-reply-to} and

rmail.texi:759:sent the message you received, and the @samp{CC} field
starts out with

rmail.texi:766:excluded from the @samp{CC} field.  They are also excluded
from the

rmail.texi:773:This omits the @samp{CC} field completely for a particular
reply.

rmail.texi:942:against the @samp{To}, @samp{From}, and @samp{CC} headers
(supply a prefix

rmail.texi:943:argument to exclude the @samp{CC} header).

Thanks.

ayatakesi <ayanokoji.takesi@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1117 bytes --]

bug#31532: Non-capitalized CC in rmail.texi(emacs-26)

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Takesi Ayanokoji <ayanokoji.takesi@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 04:47:30 +0900
> 
> In Emacs-26 manual(rmail.texi), some @code{CC} fixed to@{CC}.
> 
> But in rmail.texi, there still remain non-capitalized CC.

Where exactly?  I see only capitalized "CC" in rmail.texi.  And your
examples: 

> rmail.texi:756:@samp{Subject}, @samp{To}, @samp{CC}, @samp{In-reply-to} and
> 
> rmail.texi:759:sent the message you received, and the @samp{CC} field starts out with
> 
> rmail.texi:766:excluded from the @samp{CC} field.  They are also excluded from the
> 
> rmail.texi:773:This omits the @samp{CC} field completely for a particular reply.
> 
> rmail.texi:942:against the @samp{To}, @samp{From}, and @samp{CC} headers (supply a prefix
> 
> rmail.texi:943:argument to exclude the @samp{CC} header).

also all show only capitalized "CC".

So what is the problem?  What am I missing here?

Thanks.

bug#31532: Non-capitalized CC in rmail.texi(emacs-26)

[Takesi Ayanokoji]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1367 bytes --]

Ouch!

I am wrong report.
Please give me chance to retry it.

In sending.texi, some mail-headers(also includes CC) are capitalized before
emacs-26.
And in emacs-26, some mail-headers are capitalized, but CC mail-header is
still remains non-capitalized.

Thanks.

ayatakesi <ayanokoji.takesi@gmail.com>

2018年5月20日(日) 5:06 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:

> > From: Takesi Ayanokoji <ayanokoji.takesi@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 04:47:30 +0900
> >
> > In Emacs-26 manual(rmail.texi), some @code{CC} fixed to@{CC}.
> >
> > But in rmail.texi, there still remain non-capitalized CC.
>
> Where exactly?  I see only capitalized "CC" in rmail.texi.  And your
> examples:
>
> > rmail.texi:756:@samp{Subject}, @samp{To}, @samp{CC}, @samp{In-reply-to}
> and
> >
> > rmail.texi:759:sent the message you received, and the @samp{CC} field
> starts out with
> >
> > rmail.texi:766:excluded from the @samp{CC} field.  They are also
> excluded from the
> >
> > rmail.texi:773:This omits the @samp{CC} field completely for a
> particular reply.
> >
> > rmail.texi:942:against the @samp{To}, @samp{From}, and @samp{CC} headers
> (supply a prefix
> >
> > rmail.texi:943:argument to exclude the @samp{CC} header).
>
> also all show only capitalized "CC".
>
> So what is the problem?  What am I missing here?
>
> Thanks.
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2114 bytes --]

bug#31532: Non-capitalized CC in rmail.texi(emacs-26)

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Takesi Ayanokoji <ayanokoji.takesi@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 05:23:29 +0900
> Cc: 31532@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> In sending.texi, some mail-headers(also includes CC) are capitalized before emacs-26.
> And in emacs-26, some mail-headers are capitalized, but CC mail-header is still remains non-capitalized.

You mean, you expected to see "Cc" instead of "CC"?  If so, that's
deliberate: "CC" is an acronym, whereas the other headers are words.

If the problem is something else, please tell more.

bug#31532: Non-capitalized CC in rmail.texi(emacs-26)

[Takesi Ayanokoji]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1288 bytes --]

Hi Eli.

I'm not sure whether I can tell it clearly...

First, while translating "@chapter Sending Mail" in sending.texi, I found
many mail-headers includes acronym were fixed from uppercase word to
capitalized word(please see sending.texi:101~ "@node Mail Headers")

Next, I start to translate next chapter "@chapter Reading Mail with Rmail",
and I found a few mail-headers included above fix ware also fixed but @{CC}.

In sending.texi(preceding chapter), CC is Cc. But rmail.texi(following
chapter), CC still remains CC.

So, I guess latter is typo (or vice versa).

Do you understand what I mean.

Thanks.

ayatakesi <ayanokoji.takesi@gmail.com>


2018年5月20日(日) 15:53 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:

> > From: Takesi Ayanokoji <ayanokoji.takesi@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 05:23:29 +0900
> > Cc: 31532@debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> > In sending.texi, some mail-headers(also includes CC) are capitalized
> before emacs-26.
> > And in emacs-26, some mail-headers are capitalized, but CC mail-header
> is still remains non-capitalized.
>
> You mean, you expected to see "Cc" instead of "CC"?  If so, that's
> deliberate: "CC" is an acronym, whereas the other headers are words.
>
> If the problem is something else, please tell more.
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2256 bytes --]

bug#31532: Non-capitalized CC in rmail.texi(emacs-26)

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Takesi Ayanokoji <ayanokoji.takesi@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 16:49:29 +0900
> Cc: 31532@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> First, while translating "@chapter Sending Mail" in sending.texi, I found many mail-headers includes acronym
> were fixed from uppercase word to capitalized word(please see sending.texi:101~ "@node Mail Headers")
> 
> Next, I start to translate next chapter "@chapter Reading Mail with Rmail", and I found a few mail-headers
> included above fix ware also fixed but @{CC}.
> 
> In sending.texi(preceding chapter), CC is Cc. But rmail.texi(following chapter), CC still remains CC.
> 
> So, I guess latter is typo (or vice versa).

The "Bcc" etc. variants are incorrect; now fixed.

Thanks.