> And according to the table you show, those menu problems are resolved > in a later version of GTK+, is that right? I believe so, CentOS 7 still has menu issues. & I did see other oddness - but still definitely better with inhibit-double-buffering loading with init.el that only contains: modify-frame-parameters nil '((inhibit-double-buffering . t))) emacs -q -l ./init.el CentOS7, gtk: 2.24.31, gtk3: 3.22.10 | emacs | VcXsrv | | 25.3 gtk2 | ok | | 25.3 gtk3 | ok, no emacs logo, menus no show | | 26.1 gtk2 | ok | | 26.1 gtk3 | ok, no emacs logo, menus no show | OpenSUSE Leap 42.3 , gtk2: 2.24.31, gtk3: 3.22.10 | emacs | VcXsrv | | 25.3 gtk2 | ok | | 25.3 gtk3 | ok, but no emacs logo (1) | | 26.1 gtk2 | ok | | 26.1 gtk3 | ok, but no emacs logo (1) | OpenSUSE Tumbleweed, gtk2: 2.24.32, gtk3: 3.22.29 | emacs | VcXsrv | | 25.3 gtk2 | ok | | 25.3 gtk3 | ok, but no emacs logo (2) | | 26.1 gtk2 | ok | | 26.1 gtk3 | ok, but no emacs logo (2) | (1) "About GNU" launches external browser when in ssh remote session. But "M-x eww gnu.org" will display in eww mode. Additionally, local emacs session uses Eww mode for the about pages, and displays emacs logo. (2) "About GNU" launches non-emacs text editor of .html when in ssh remote session. But "M-x eww gnu.org" will display in eww mode. Additionally, local emacs session does use Eww mode for About GNU. but also opens the .html into non-emacs text editor (gedit), and does not display emacs logo at startup. On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 2:47 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Noam Postavsky > > Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 21:27:40 -0400 > > Cc: 31169@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > charlie hemlock writes: > > > > > However, in Centos7 (with vcxsrv), the file menus don't appear OK when > > > clicked as previously reported (see gtk errors in previous posts) A > > > different issue? > > > > Yeah, the other bug specifically mentions that menus work fine, so it > > sounds like you're hitting some other issue as well. > > And according to the table you show, those menu problems are resolved > in a later version of GTK+, is that right? >