Re: customizing dircolors doesn't take effect in emacs shell

[Yuan Luo <yuan.hypnos.luo@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1668 bytes --]

All aliases in ~/.bashrc are listed in emacs shells.
I already had have ansi-color-for-comint-mode-on set.
execution of ls traces to /bin/ls

Maybe i was not clear in the beginning, the emacs shell can show colors,
but not to my customization, for example, I customized it to show
executables in purple, it still show them in red. While a regular terminal
shows the desirable purple color for executables (as in below, left is
regular terminal, right is emacs shell).

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Peter Dyballa <Peter_Dyballa@web.de> wrote:

>
> Am 9.1.2012 um 02:05 schrieb Yuan Luo:
>
> > alias l='ls -CF'
> > alias la='ls -A'
> > alias ll='ls -alF'
> > alias ls='ls --color=auto'
> >
> > Anything noticeable?
>
> IMO it's not recommended to use the same symbol, "ls", left and right of
> the equals sign. I recommend to use the full pathname of the ls programme
> when this programme is meant.
>
> Are all aliases from ~/.bashrc listed inside GNU Emacs?
>
> Can you trace the execution of the ls alias?
>
> Have you tried to use the more ANSI compliant "term" function/emulation?
>
> It can be that you need to set up the *shell* buffer to actually show
> colours (*term* has it activated by default, by its more complete
> compliance to ANSI):
>
>    (add-hook 'shell-mode-hook (lambda ()
>        (ansi-color-for-comint-mode-on)))
>
> Check your GNU Emacs documentation on this topic!
>
> --
> Greetings
>
>  Pete
>
> The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
> discoveries, is not "Eureka!" (I found it!) but "That's funny..."
>                                – Isaac Asimov
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 56235 bytes --]