From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jai Dayal Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Does anyone really use emacs in terminal? Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 12:46:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <0b72021c-139f-4269-8e81-5b5ef97fb83d@googlegroups.com> <8761yu64e4.fsf@Servus.decebal.nl> <87r4higq45.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip2tyftv.fsf@yahoo.fr> <20130508155351.GA5399@hysteria.proulx.com> <87obclrrb9.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> <25153223-A058-4762-A1FC-7744472B958A@Web.DE> <87obckqg7f.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87k3n8qf7l.fsf@wanadoo.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1368118038 10660 80.91.229.3 (9 May 2013 16:47:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 16:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D3scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 09 18:47:17 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UaTzx-0003f7-Ib for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 18:47:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40707 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaTzx-0005xw-89 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 12:47:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43603) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaTzk-0005xX-P6 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 12:47:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaTzf-0008Db-SX for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 12:47:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vb0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22f]:49996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaTzf-0008DW-Ns for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 12:46:59 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-vb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id x14so2675171vbb.6 for ; Thu, 09 May 2013 09:46:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=N+01syaMbv6Evs5i/fzm3DOKiQA46v/E2uwf5FvstV8=; b=SGaiOtI0HCQZnvcP/9cEK4iMAZ1bj3NF/daboe+CNIXUTbLy7v1E7ZRi+PLhOUhDTY NX6R0v2bVUjdJxphN39cdffgEv7yf5FQnpP/TrPyEpVD1INcuZiuHsDoRiFSdzEt0IOi OzTbIJ/eVLLiieAwKlV5PuFaWWNiUdms6tk7Eszt9Jwl3xrM/S+MdKjn4JPK1zYixoyF y3u+9hItLZoofRBZxewxMBpkZoX3AY8HW9kZimiF2pGMUR6UrjBAo1qegfrmGH6FIayv yfeqWkaKHQeQO/RW48hzzOlh/k5joqUNoUZO3yX3aJrji9Z4ImafaWNPNdFnhFHR4Z2T p4fg== X-Received: by 10.52.0.198 with SMTP id 6mr1396229vdg.65.1368118019275; Thu, 09 May 2013 09:46:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.220.75.67 with HTTP; Thu, 9 May 2013 09:46:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.220.75.67 with HTTP; Thu, 9 May 2013 09:46:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k3n8qf7l.fsf@wanadoo.es> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22f X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:90591 Archived-At: Emacs mode on vim is not just basic features. The point is: the author (or anyone else) cannot accurately defend the original statement, thus the original author should be banned for deliberately spreading false information. For the record, I do not use Vim. On May 9, 2013 10:41 AM, "=D3scar Fuentes" wrote: > Jai Dayal writes: > > > You just admitted not yet Vim but then want emacs mode in vim to be > exactly > > emacs? At any rate, that functionality is available in Vim. > > > > So again, the initial statement doesn't hold, at all. > > There is a huge difference among "not 100% vim yet" (vim emulation on > Emacs) with "the most simple features forever" (Emacs emulation on Vim) > > And now I wonder why I'm arguing on yet another stupid editor flamewar, > considering that I'm a happy user of Emacs and Vi(m), currently using > Emacs+vimpulse and enjoying the best of both worlds. > > >