From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jai Dayal Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Does anyone really use emacs in terminal? Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 12:27:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <0b72021c-139f-4269-8e81-5b5ef97fb83d@googlegroups.com> <8761yu64e4.fsf@Servus.decebal.nl> <87r4higq45.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip2tyftv.fsf@yahoo.fr> <20130508155351.GA5399@hysteria.proulx.com> <87obclrrb9.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> <25153223-A058-4762-A1FC-7744472B958A@Web.DE> <87r4hg6s90.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1368116847 30186 80.91.229.3 (9 May 2013 16:27:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 16:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs To: Hongxu Chen Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 09 18:27:25 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UaTgf-0004sK-JZ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 18:27:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53191 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaTgf-0003sq-76 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 12:27:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaTgT-0003qs-GS for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 12:27:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaTgS-0000x7-Bh for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 12:27:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:35657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaTgS-0000x1-7O for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 12:27:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id gd11so2933644vcb.0 for ; Thu, 09 May 2013 09:27:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1PbMTVrSy2kIBdvFH+lc+yrRTjg7SF/GkaH0pTFmSJE=; b=doS9SvoJ5/f0Dirx3pH59mamUDjMwT/gZHf86mr3Yd6tKi4Qcyu/q1aTVhz7HsApNG DZQv8fedAd/js/M8RXYb7ka98gq5JMKpAAzzb9BKe1l5nFbYmtXFWwuRpg3TOS9BxEiT vlg1rA6gGBn00GCTKqItJ9ZFvSxbjaqITID48nToWLJbFzSiT9WcXuA56ZeI7+Yrcz8s J9+CsDDETQHlmuRbgdssmjE4WpfGtNUg/CtvZ8IMKOUqta8IDEqb+YvFfktDGlls0Xep zY6uPbX5jUFllB9Xrjp3B+7bBS3e3hLgxyjTF9EgerHbGVXM3jnAU/pTOVVX6yRj0Or3 enMA== X-Received: by 10.220.96.17 with SMTP id f17mr8314400vcn.58.1368116827739; Thu, 09 May 2013 09:27:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.220.75.67 with HTTP; Thu, 9 May 2013 09:27:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.220.75.67 with HTTP; Thu, 9 May 2013 09:27:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87r4hg6s90.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.220.169 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:90587 Archived-At: What's viper mode supposed to be in Emacs? You mean key bindings? All Vim modes really are are just key sequences. On May 9, 2013 10:19 AM, "Hongxu Chen" wrote: > > What's Emacs mode supposed to be in Vim? > > You mean the keybindings? > > Jai Dayal writes: > > > Emacs doesn't really run Vim.. it has Viper mode, but it's not nearly > Vim. > > Similarly, in Vim, you can run emacs mode. > > > > > > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Luca Ferrari > wrote: > > > >> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Jai Dayal wrote: > >> > Um... what exactly can emacs do that vim can't? Or is vim not > included > >> in > >> > "etc"? > >> > >> Well, probably emacs can run vim....;) > >> Emacs is a lisp interpreter that happens to have an editor running as > >> default application! > >> > >> Luca > >> > >> > > -- > Regards, > Hongxu Chen >