From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jai Dayal Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Does anyone really use emacs in terminal? Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 17:08:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: <0b72021c-139f-4269-8e81-5b5ef97fb83d@googlegroups.com> <8761yu64e4.fsf@Servus.decebal.nl> <87r4higq45.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip2tyftv.fsf@yahoo.fr> <20130508155351.GA5399@hysteria.proulx.com> <87obclrrb9.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> <25153223-A058-4762-A1FC-7744472B958A@Web.DE> <2A25C277-7CBD-47DC-8954-67D0C2A87009@web.de> <5D59EB28-D184-4012-9AFE-0EC0A968A559@web.de> <8761ys6kcy.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1368133742 16420 80.91.229.3 (9 May 2013 21:09:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 21:09:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs To: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 09 23:09:01 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UaY5E-0006C1-3i for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 23:09:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45725 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaY5D-0003KT-LQ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 17:08:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33289) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaY53-0003KO-To for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 17:08:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaY50-0005ln-Up for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 17:08:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ia0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22f]:64106) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaY50-0005kE-Q2 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 17:08:46 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ia0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m10so659877iam.34 for ; Thu, 09 May 2013 14:08:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DDKf0K5U4vqtjCMVgmH+4KOLpHi+PbaUPEHHKBPZPwI=; b=aVMUqXEYJ0GSw20WN6UW7UCNsHJyCquHvuwpA25wWRg7m+/BHlAdz5rcWg58bNaDvV +0kIWADmkKAsCKVm24xIm2agNgf8vDRb0Hmb2APeoshMkbFJpmefEY9LX9K4ok2+LSSz a4sUfVnf3AtGV/NTzSZhDwqKNw2Uw3jbTVGkeDhV3pCszWD8snQhNQW6nGGadq/k7+04 5e5zA6Um61nSInENWoR46SBYgnSyu7DBFY7t0RbDS6M+36lPCUziEDKKVMIrASzkT8vr QoBEgAJSaqHBHtqgRxTybMWVKBJa/HnCKiH6Eh15AciVvluH9zChRaCq9thbMqiyCjMo xnOQ== X-Received: by 10.50.57.19 with SMTP id e19mr8506576igq.110.1368133726249; Thu, 09 May 2013 14:08:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.50.73.102 with HTTP; Thu, 9 May 2013 14:08:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.50.73.102 with HTTP; Thu, 9 May 2013 14:08:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8761ys6kcy.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22f X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:90612 Archived-At: He was not accurate because he stated this could not be done in Vim. On May 9, 2013 2:06 PM, "Jay Belanger" wrote: > Jai Dayal writes: > > > And BTW, you said "visit", not edit. Visit does not strictly mean edit. > > From the Emacs manual: > "Visiting" a file means reading its contents into an Emacs buffer so > you can edit them. Emacs makes a new buffer for each file that you > visit. > > > You are just as ambiguous as you are inaccurate. > > Technically true, since he was both unambiguous and accurate. >