Re: send selection or current line to Terminal/iTerm

[Jai Dayal <dayalsoap@gmail.com>]

Right, you had to write code for Emacs, meaning you had to extend upon
emacs.
On Jun 12, 2014 3:15 PM, "Emanuel Berg" <embe8573@student.uu.se> wrote:

> Jai Dayal <dayalsoap@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > So your statement of "of course it's possible" is
> > just a strawman argument because I never said it was
> > impossible. You then went on useless rant about how
> > to communicate with other processes, which is useless
>
> I'm not getting into an argument over this. This is is
> not a debate. I know what I write and if you consider
> that useless to all and everyone that's a statement
> that cannot be verified anyway.
>
> > If you can extend or change the application, sure.
>
> You don't necessarily need to change *the* application,
> though that would help, of course. There are many other
> applications that you may put in-between to do such a
> thing.
>
> The example I gave was the code I wrote for Emacs,
> which was about half a page - to tmux, it was a
> oneliner, and the glue in between - xsel - I simply
> installed. Also note the Elisp code is just loaded by
> the Emacs Lisp interpreter at startup time - and the
> tmux oneliner is in a tmux configuration file. While
> this is certainly programming it isn't anything
> extremely difficult that involves branching,
> recompilation, etc. Besides it doesn't matter how
> difficult it supposedly is. If you want to do it, get
> in someone's face and do it. Simple as that.
>
> --
> underground experts united:
> http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
>