On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Glenn Morris wrote: > Le Wang wrote: > > > So two issue come up: should symbol even be supported by > `eval-after-load` > > if the feature might not be finished loading? If it has to be kept for > > backward compatibility, documentation should explicitly say don't use > > symbol because the feature might not be finished loading. > > The version of eval-after-load in the trunk handles this better, so that > even if provide is not at the end of the file, the eval-after-load forms > do not run until the file has finished loading. > > What is the second issue? > Sorry, the two issues are documentation and implementation. Clearly the implementation has been fixed, I just checked that the documentation is also correct. Please close this bug. -- Le