P.S. I'm aware this was borrowed from the likes of Clojure (as was seq),
but sometimes it's not a great idea to bring in external terminology 1:1.
Anyways, that's not major. When I added those hash-table specific function
the point was to extend a specific API, not to look for some generic
solution.

On 22 June 2015 at 08:28, Bozhidar Batsov <bozhidar@batsov.com> wrote:

> Sounds a bit strange to me. Those are somewhat basic hash-table-specific
> stuff. If you're going to obsolete them, why not obsolete everything except
> hash-table constructors? Somewhere a line has to be drawn.
>
> Btw, I'm still not sure about the "map" naming, as this is a term that's
> not used at all in Emacs Lisp terminology and will be the source of a lot
> of confusing I guess.
>
> On 21 June 2015 at 21:58, Nicolas Petton <nicolas@petton.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm thinking about obsoleting `hash-table-empty-p', `hash-table-keys'
>> and `hash-table-values' defined in subr-x in favor of their map-*
>> equivalent.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nico
>> --
>> Nicolas Petton
>> http://nicolas-petton.fr
>>
>
>