I'm fine with Artur's proposal. "Almost working" is the same as not working. :-) On 20 May 2015 at 18:36, raman wrote: > Actually it would be sad to see the async package bits go -- it's > *almost* working. Can we live with silenced messages as at present, and > a slightly more descriptive message for "transaction ..." rather than > losing the async goodness? > -- >