Sounds reasonable. Maybe we can use another name, though? Something in the lines of `helpers`, `extras`, etc. On 30 October 2013 15:11, Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> (defun hash-keys (hashtable) > > It would have to be "hash-table-keys". > > But again, I'm not sure it provides a useful enough abstraction to > justify adding this one-liner in every Emacs executable. > > Tho, maybe we could introduce a new file "oneliners.el" where we could > collect such functions (probably most/all defined as `defsubst' so that > you can (eval-when-compile (require 'oneliners)). > > > Stefan >