From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrew Hyatt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A proposal for removing obsolete packages Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 04:45:13 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83twmkkv16.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1143fae03a07a0052ad649d5 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454474755 803 80.91.229.3 (3 Feb 2016 04:45:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 04:45:55 +0000 (UTC) To: John Wiegley , Richard Stallman , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 03 05:45:51 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aQpKA-0006uy-Bo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 05:45:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60707 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQpK9-0006qW-AL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 23:45:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46310) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQpJr-0006pp-A7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 23:45:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQpJp-0004RH-LL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 23:45:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-vk0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::235]:33159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQpJl-0004Qd-F6; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 23:45:25 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-vk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id e64so6472163vkg.0; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 20:45:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=YVXIYVP8rh8CoXQ7BiwaHbrI+vXUeGTbAHOHVk0RN4E=; b=B66ZTP7PhNSyUE2U587nFfZtqMYZM06AU9D+QYP+FgEVh8RnL4shep1fGOX9aGCqDE L6VIYRFBlngotumZO/R+Nyhp2bF0zbbNJ1qiXysMonYrYmzvGSRbBa+LIyQS6+oLLT1G SpMCyb8zDO7fDC8XH4XewbyjUVA9SkcGZUVSnSqN4ziyrJLHTe8OuJR+7YdEBgUjuHu1 S0yUQ/5i3hIAq3Iot1yb+wEc6pTAO1lGDYuYt9AgfgabR77p9piXbo5zYCYIpb2g6NEK 6tHfNFlXW2Rt7Ua55GE9ivTr/R8SSlZLrDbuQca/ocyjEAxRMcT1p+bXPg/DKOWpHhvP /Mdg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=YVXIYVP8rh8CoXQ7BiwaHbrI+vXUeGTbAHOHVk0RN4E=; b=k7LX3lLCrxIaraEGlBE1Gkn9+uyDiSRnLypX0Hu17PPQjzD14yoLcu0EnGBUzhYg4m nM/8X74BJU0kh7oWsQ7oRQzgwoDLtb6BAhYeo5fE82VCzA83My7Zy/ihrvZZY+a0kGSO qk+WAnjDK04ZhiwC5xeGBc2q9ehaFNVeX8Fnt5lFM5EIv7Jc68NV/e8APNr27fZD9as8 ouO+3bZDvzDf3z8MSFCbAzSBbkpxNRzRGW0wPwcZuHIKaaP34beElMgKQ+3/iGG5D+yc TtPHCpSF4C+OlglgW1seN/hjY2/GBVFRrjsnP6CkXjGy2eShPE+jcO2Pt1RTmQGPMhr/ 3+RA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTYlZBT00ehIIhf36GnBWHQO3++qXDYrKxQ3h6conQNANXzORQKH1dJCuccS2eS0wS3mRjxebmpCk1VDg== X-Received: by 10.31.47.200 with SMTP id v191mr24098295vkv.116.1454474723459; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 20:45:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c05::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199210 Archived-At: --001a1143fae03a07a0052ad649d5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:32 PM John Wiegley wrote: > >>>>> John Wiegley writes: > > > Other than cl-compat, I'm OK with deleting these. Does anyone have any > other > > objections? > > According to objections from Drew about options, we'll keep that one as > well. > Sounds good. The only other objections I've heard were from Richard Stallman about the iso-* packages, but from what I can tell, the objections have been answered and the conversation about those has moved to other issues. Richard, if I'm misunderstanding, let me know. I'll remove these packages (except for cl-compat and options) tomorrow from the trunk. > > -- > John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F > http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2 > --001a1143fae03a07a0052ad649d5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jan 26= , 2016 at 12:32 PM John Wiegley <j= wiegley@gmail.com> wrote:
&g= t;>>>> John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com> writes:

> Other than cl-compat, I'm OK with deleting these. Does anyone have= any other
> objections?

According to objections from Drew about options, we'll keep that one as= well.

Sounds good.=C2=A0 The only othe= r objections I've heard were from Richard Stallman about the iso-* pack= ages, but from what I can tell, the objections have been answered and the c= onversation about those has moved to other issues.=C2=A0 Richard, if I'= m misunderstanding, let me know.

I'll remove t= hese packages (except for cl-compat and options) tomorrow from the trunk.
=C2=A0

--
John Wiegley=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = GPG fingerprint =3D 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
htt= p://newartisans.com=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
--001a1143fae03a07a0052ad649d5--