Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com> writes:
> I haven't taken a close look, but I know that reading symbols goes so
> great lengths of growing its buffer as needed. Maybe this is missing in
> this case. Or something similar.
I've pushed a fix to master. Could you please check, Andrew?
It does work for me, thank you for the fix! I don't think I really understand what is going on here either (does anyone? is the length of the path in the name the relevant thing here?), but if there's a solution that works, then that's enough for me, thanks. I'll close this bug.