From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Understanding dotimes skipping by 2 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:16:31 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20180927224840.GA2161@mail.akwebsoft.com> <87efdem1fx.fsf@phil.uni-goettingen.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1538158514 3008 195.159.176.226 (28 Sep 2018 18:15:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 18:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Van L , Help Gnu Emacs mailing list To: joost.kremers@phil.uni-goettingen.de Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 28 20:15:09 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g5xIB-0000dX-B1 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 20:15:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44962 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g5xKH-0006eL-RV for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:17:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37169) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g5xJl-0006df-UE for Help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:16:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g5xJk-0001cB-Rh for Help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:16:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ot1-x335.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::335]:36241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g5xJk-0001Y6-Ga for Help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:16:44 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-x335.google.com with SMTP id c18-v6so6928428otm.3 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 11:16:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/0NOzs2vpGUReMCv7hM5+mTHB/v8i72DXJCn0nCGX0w=; b=cVw10MZSs1YXcnoeDgR2PUzhbuDv1U7TNjr2BhCuIo+audWbIndTSy7U61eXcF/s60 TclpDZIJZWUl3mhFyw10n5zxlbcKS8tayUO7MQ0XKMmmydkN7Gt/wWgAZqesyV9W1+GJ nORXx9Z01InrcRTOOlD2F0ADb452W0DhZcByWbVDZFbUOXt7Ni548pCych1wVRT1+RVf Pb8azRTfwEqIuHVSPSImaGILc0N9TeRFlssuMt4qrKxoCaMhac7233S1t0FrPeTIZQFs Yx9vyFX4lGRHqbmNlGCJi1qRUnwmfSCwPdm/Cc0FexdJ/ZvED1pHz4FnPUVVV7zfsvxs JfVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/0NOzs2vpGUReMCv7hM5+mTHB/v8i72DXJCn0nCGX0w=; b=lYyqqWBKjs73R1NsLJ8UnLiaROt/vpmYomeW1DNmaNZaZ64r2CrSkNll1Xpl4wmJbi WMtXqh/oYlUFdp+dB513nMGYzHg2k7crOJc1IA9vYwkpSVhOt3hqVMjyunxy/osM8xVk pGNNY6ILuVYt0tLD3IyIrgcdCvZbC52MyC+eLGM/NVH6tj+0qydx1ciXQSvado73KUqN rmEa21qnqbwDqJQ+OiVIMeAKi2JnTv6D+lWVTPUCqEj9P3maK7WvK1AUvbYd4FEcHeKp dlHK8ocMuKZ8b3cBYjYQkbFfOh0mGtNHOc54qX/TKnw/YrOvW2cAIggK18IOHsaDJkrB XJ4A== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoiTtDqMicVgN6W/Ek4dBBi7PUmwAhqFs3UBgWfqQL2iuh4nk3d8 uXPNYCYwz1dkXHc73QW84oqiz6/IZu4lSXrjG8KZB+B1 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62epmJb/SDSRwppYwqLDCFoEEh9ijk30cA5nf8EKYSTQdxirTk50od6vC3mDHoVyjuFw4z9pfYLWcp4mAK2pDk= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:23a3:: with SMTP id t32-v6mr10055981otb.65.1538158603338; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 11:16:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87efdem1fx.fsf@phil.uni-goettingen.de> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::335 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:118055 Archived-At: On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 at 12:26, Joost Kremers wrote: > - Note also the use of `(1+ x)' instead of (+ x 1). Though > honestly I don't know what the difference really is. It's just > the idiom I'm used to. There's no difference except for the human reader: compare (disassemble (lambda (x) (1+ x))) and (disassemble (lambda (x) (+ 1 x))), the same code is generated.