From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32658: gnutls + non-blocking url-retrieve Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 14:25:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <861sa5zmpt.fsf@DESKTOP-DQBDJ0U.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <86tvm6smax.fsf@DESKTOP-DQBDJ0U.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83efda431j.fsf@gnu.org> <86h8i5pf5f.fsf@DESKTOP-DQBDJ0U.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1538763893 27401 195.159.176.226 (5 Oct 2018 18:24:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 18:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 32658@debbugs.gnu.org To: thomas@m3y3r.de Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 05 20:24:49 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g8UmO-00071O-9X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 20:24:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36537 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g8UoU-00070y-V8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 14:26:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46211) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g8Unj-0006Wd-LH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 14:26:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g8Una-0008KA-AS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 14:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33934) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g8UnZ-0008JE-Tt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 14:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g8UnZ-0005Qk-L1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 14:26:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 18:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32658 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 32658-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32658.153876392220822 (code B ref 32658); Fri, 05 Oct 2018 18:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32658) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Oct 2018 18:25:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38192 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g8Umw-0005Pm-4F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 14:25:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi1-f180.google.com ([209.85.167.180]:34552) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g8Umt-0005PW-AJ for 32658@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 14:25:20 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi1-f180.google.com with SMTP id v69-v6so11180988oif.1 for <32658@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 11:25:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oaMKLApexugW6OBYALPyapQPl3tyze/u6WFRVSdGT64=; b=JvqFTt83HlssgR0VuMDCv1Xu8t7GqV843VpC4rkAF8/7tKt1+LLOESUpqwh+QaH8Q7 DZImGy7fAvMIwse+qeRHz/aHc1zj+HUHgvAKB2Zjcp0dVHfpKZZdHccS6MrM68/bx7Dp zVGx0aHe6puIsDtBcDtO5YtHsNVM8aO18ejU0zEJaEz0JUs/P71j9JSK3cl449LC+kE6 QggDvmkT3EoVqKd/LGncQSp9vYZ8lnnDKEJp9yTuGxMm8CjdqfzhboiWls9zQUNtuxXo mzgA3KWNEYlZsUm7/5CyKUftnYQnch8z5m4k+OEl8TgrQCgPe/s4a37RQBHKWbO9ENEv EK8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oaMKLApexugW6OBYALPyapQPl3tyze/u6WFRVSdGT64=; b=TGpuSfa/1SGGHNBopKzLibi2ZV5EFLYeXnRRP1T2hJRwW7dODLC2CkMkMTYg0Tf45q Pmys6QcP8vO6HazElOgKRjRieiwjpuAZKTdRAzp+etYuNp5IpVCZ4SWr/krf4gGzc4uM Q+7wrUtFGeQwLEs+37QkLKz1XpAmYkrThPjnN7kvM37dNXCgyTpCDU+w+L3tweK/AMDa nOjcOG6bC/ohMzBz/MjeGyiwYlcN3Xrz0Fn/qlJ+kWM6Y/gH2noayA2/VnH3toHiXXcq UHBtdCUuENLo3BKqLWwz3Z4tHu60/7ozZPdG6p7cZBOxTbM4/YMco0+X3yydhFLZqGG/ jcQw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogTzINiyAQvKzghifRzmfbqBoPmZitNRw+JZlFPcy8Hw7YBjljl Vob2Yv9l36wuzkcgpkQVBmPd3TUrFvxMIrP0/Zk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62H+9rzRG4OTgFrDhOI/r9aUSPt1t9kM8lBdw+JUZ3AWqWScGUv9IRgwMQIDzJiLN3h5j55fwYKMv96oxkw8fM= X-Received: by 2002:aca:d447:: with SMTP id l68-v6mr74193oig.222.1538763913563; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 11:25:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86h8i5pf5f.fsf@DESKTOP-DQBDJ0U.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:150956 Archived-At: On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 16:54, wrote: > okay, thats an easy one to explain. > I did download emacs 26.1 from here: > http://mirror.netcologne.de/gnu/emacs/windows/emacs-26/emacs-26.1-x86_64.zip > > in the bin directory there is the gnutls packaged. version is 3.6.0. > *** Fatal error: Error in the push function. > Could not connect to 45.33.94.129:443: Bad file descriptor > > This doesn't work, because of some error -53 (ERROR_BAD_NETPATH). For the record, I tried with the same Emacs (albeit from my local mirror), and I get the same error with gnutls-cli, but M-x eww works fine. > > Or maybe this is specific to your network connection? Does any HTTPS > > connection cause these problems? > > no, only some I think. I think it could be interesting to characterize the difference (e.g., is it always with certain servers?) > what springs into the eye is the difference of number of re-tries that > are necessary to establish an TLS connection 4905 vs. 3. > > Why does url-retrieve give up after 3 re-tries? When I try with eww here, I see gnutls.c: [1] (Emacs) non-fatal error: Resource temporarily unavailable, try again. [6 times] (and it does open the page successfully, as I said above)