From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29165: 26.0.90; can't use some code byte-compiled under emacs 24 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 09:35:31 -0500 Message-ID: References: <6eh8u7x5be.fsf@just-testing.permabit.com> <87375r7f0g.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <9f1e7a1f-bfc0-43a4-9acb-cf69b85587be@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1509978980 14043 195.159.176.226 (6 Nov 2017 14:36:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 14:36:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ken Raeburn , Philipp Stephani , 29165@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 06 15:36:16 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBiVa-0003KW-3Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 15:36:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48495 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBiVe-0004YB-8o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 09:36:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36919) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBiVT-0004Y2-KH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 09:36:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBiVO-0005x6-5R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 09:36:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44499) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBiVO-0005x2-2J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 09:36:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBiVN-0008Ez-Pz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 09:36:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29165 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 29165-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29165.150997893931644 (code B ref 29165); Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29165) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2017 14:35:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53180 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBiV1-0008EK-Dk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 09:35:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr0-f180.google.com ([209.85.128.180]:47662) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBiUz-0008E4-PP for 29165@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 09:35:38 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr0-f180.google.com with SMTP id k61so2967519wrc.4 for <29165@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 06:35:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=+B5eaK3onRChWOFZYYXB2JTYDx2Rftn9H4p/B/lpPCo=; b=eQxsnORUoYCuJAwxDu7/OPln4zgkaywEM/XrgRgdjj6gyJsuHbSYEmyYfilrQSDrVn nXhqtBAX9gL+BDXO5a/6Xi6GyHlae2JOk0OcuJBKGrQIly6jDnGOPB+oFhG1PiXB91Fn YjRa1BQXi4cgiWzEhZfy/fZ6Q9wB6/i9zw+0Am/UeWMFCB3sAkXON8R3ntRmRv8GeVPi YfT7ZfYLRw/PDkPMKfUIwR40BPDcl1cL1XRIiY9vZNkQ5BgV3p6DXD3O3T5ZLeF2mRIL /+TK1DhChQY8GvIciKEwEEeK4C3y8x1H6Xb5bwGjsKVj8GACj3agzNLkPu0WalKEXIxr E3tw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+B5eaK3onRChWOFZYYXB2JTYDx2Rftn9H4p/B/lpPCo=; b=Eo3R4t9yuga8CpbXDgNh4DLTNO91zZRMovrJjlwBm2J4eC0C085EdQobnROOBUyec5 7T5xI3zAfbIbAGRoo6rpsSVxeUI5c+z31FIBaUJ+av90cO767MvUkV0MNeOkP/qaO1AG lSluncgonHWN/FwRfU43b7CuQ+VZFqaGP2jw/6BcNfDKfxE24hojTqiaHc4YqcOfP3ex PINOqfn3+f6grQeSx8uQPkGBI5vKrcsgSMm403XzF9QnoCLxTBxUdP48frNX4SZpdvtL c9Fzx7rkpxy0mXQz0y1VTISmPH8W981rFYn1RiaAl1bP4jlV4VMyf+hN2MH16xHV2Hi9 Rd4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXz8HmJV+Ji+rGBzhwzQ7td8sTjcswpQzTwLKeKX7G9qabhhz6v ehYd12J0+MubDtbbc47OIg6uDIpGfkREdYOFiic= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TrU2g8aPr398z5MF76e86+u0wUYQpJStKLHV/v0DE1aPg7DoLzTVRBw4uxgMjt3XNDdNLij/B+Kzk4mX9pQxA= X-Received: by 10.223.189.13 with SMTP id j13mr13613948wrh.94.1509978931423; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 06:35:31 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.223.146.227 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 06:35:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9f1e7a1f-bfc0-43a4-9acb-cf69b85587be@default> X-Google-Sender-Auth: jbWQkHpTUjpkqtU6pTflEqHTNNQ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:139503 Archived-At: On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Drew Adams wrote: >> We should perhaps put something about throwing error on '&option &rest' >> into NEWS though. > > I don't understand. In Common Lisp it is perfectly correct > to use both &optional and &rest. What's rejected is (&optional &rest other-vars), whereas (&optional var1 &rest other-vars) is okay. Does CL accept the first form (and if yes, what does it mean)? I couldn't tell from the page you linked to.