From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pretty printing frames from *Backtrace* Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 18:05:29 -0500 Message-ID: References: <877f80i1sd.fsf@web.de> <87poln7fwz.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480028788 29605 195.159.176.226 (24 Nov 2016 23:06:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 23:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?UTF-8?B?Q2zDqW1lbnQgUGl0LS1DbGF1ZGVs?= , Emacs developers To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 25 00:06:24 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cA35z-0006ut-KF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:06:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42630 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cA363-0003jh-C4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 18:06:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cA35A-0003Cb-3j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 18:05:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cA359-0000TD-54 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 18:05:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]:35058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cA358-0000SI-Vq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 18:05:31 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id b126so64332177oia.2 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 15:05:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e+RUChjudsvz40bZfnaJhkUGNrnuDpVz/74VH/IonEM=; b=tTADO9LvFo+K29tsHEGmrFFmrtOA+onsJV0RdbD2BpfGkrutu1iI2DIAjhiFU4T0NW AaTWZQH8eSZkQ4xlFO8j4qAf7q1UWm/Qw6HBp/eoZ5CSNG9lM0tAPOxVz+J4Vz9hCib7 UaOaub5zywHnm7eS3jSPlLZ0cT3wyETYYcrmMYI0qlNdJ45QABzd0kb6htLK9cy47u3q EVzCPKdHHX6A03u3EXc/nI/RSQhX6NyoyDWcw7/vbRL+kGh0Q5MGC4xXTQ5x30U0In/E V/W4hiycpUJuGC3JPy17I7JZyu0sYucpe/DFR8MRgOq6jTmMhpTKBEKFSRoDgPDVK9RV 2irw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e+RUChjudsvz40bZfnaJhkUGNrnuDpVz/74VH/IonEM=; b=Lwhk0SsPYI0r13Lz2xtLuW/E61a4vJ/cVV9r9QmeveuXiZQr0a1dw+jH/iXR9a2p/S AxRyWcq1dwT58EaATTJbfC1tF34jjd4ND8GVs29/6gXsrKWUWxiy0MtM5qvSqCnZV8na VL8KXEkSzXw/PFLptisvjKdvVj1/8yMDHBUe+Vcg2aUtluSOw1SV7UxdPV6drm4fEAse w8COyFyBVqN0JOw3k+8iM7qViPO02u7wgRWxms3xSyd7YkKg0A5OHcFT9EgDaiWDTAD0 8rtaPe9n2SedwQscLS3BKrkVwF9btDVqWyYDH68cT9x4IPNXccQG4QyyiDzIXUu2a+Vx 8A6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02CkCJq+bPBwccIm4tzH/5BLaa5C5QubE2SUk3KWDTHre7kqyjGYDeiYQrMBuLbMEklL5zyEF8Z1AUe5A== X-Received: by 10.157.42.78 with SMTP id t72mr2719234ota.139.1480028730023; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 15:05:30 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.157.4.67 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 15:05:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87poln7fwz.fsf@web.de> X-Google-Sender-Auth: Eu5B-SnMTS1gpP2CDt96tRz-LJw X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209583 Archived-At: On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Michael Heerdegen wrote: > Cl=C3=A9ment Pit--Claudel writes: > >> On 2016-11-21 18:31, Noam Postavsky wrote: >> > Ah, if you can reuse the debugger's counting that's okay. I still >> > think this would be better as an integrated feature of the debugger >> > though. [...] having this feature really looks like a bare minimum to >> > me, not an addon. >> >> +1; Michael, the features you described sound like they would make >> very nice additions to the core `debug'! > > So, should I create a patch against debug.el of master? I don't speak > C, so everything I have to offer will be Elisp. > Yes please. I don't think C code is needed for this anyway.