From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4710: 23.1.50; Bad display of underlines crossing line boundaries Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 07:45:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4E75B5FE.1030208@dogan.se> <4515BD8DE6284A249A67403FC1292685@us.oracle.com> <67910CA13BCC481CB3F0E99477C8AC97@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1468496787 23660 80.91.229.3 (14 Jul 2016 11:46:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , Stefan Monnier , 4710@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrew Hyatt Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 14 13:46:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bNf5o-00008G-Hn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:46:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52971 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNf5n-0001zI-RF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 07:46:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55863) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNf5h-0001yw-5f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 07:46:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNf5e-00019z-1F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 07:46:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38270) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNf5d-00019q-Ts for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 07:46:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bNf5d-00062S-LU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 07:46:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 4710 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 4710-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B4710.146849674223185 (code B ref 4710); Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4710) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jul 2016 11:45:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50607 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bNf5J-00061t-Sz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 07:45:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com ([209.85.218.47]:33718) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bNf5G-00061f-Hu for 4710@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 07:45:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id j185so106770591oih.0 for <4710@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 04:45:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=WhoahGUqbvHtLO7U9sasfZE/GcT16S/eusgpAxXYxrM=; b=tha3WC3Z5ozoPnGcU3Ik/f2dRHR2oPEZbeNlJxQAiCQwRpUT13vqp14KAkhtFgfuiq ozK5FsLP5hg/PA+OdyOx0nbf9c3vI3BkRjr1zUpuNkqUG4VWL9aJQB91j8qhhgph0GLJ 2OHtR6wERLLGWezEfe0ULu0952pEnFYBorrRdHOBbHPUWhZ46Ab97z5m3HiuQciLyaGV k5JqLp5d00wnODzh8DRfjHS7N0Iu9QBdymg9WMkd1iWwTgYjZvMMXIME92A310VUOqN2 RLI6vTbCRWTTqLM0cIZ3YIqPtFJbXpB4svrrwPcq3q4qqFiC7tkxvd5B9x16mUZ15jtw QkDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WhoahGUqbvHtLO7U9sasfZE/GcT16S/eusgpAxXYxrM=; b=LQwWJzNehiE24Zm3ommevoQq5zwLIzwqlQBqwghwzuZNBHmNoJhdFEFixsGtP6mhq3 JaR4jS0edFDkUbbAv6IspoRezSU8BlHCzVPi8d+bGDNoEY1C0nI7x3Zn+wfYpJezbzZw r0uO9w8qCb2G1H7ITnojr46mZovVTB4Rny9LzhDCqy88cyXp5EAgE9KV+RHGGqzxRyzF +r8KimB9YYZ+PJIMXQ5fOHUwjIGmd7IMnwUY0kCbmDRjEXd4TafN0u1zMXT2HmPvnEV1 b8+90E0zZ86rRgvAks0bvhU8EUrRLTirqazaFr5uF6uZwoDiJ3c1oWKdgj6SXy7b1ob3 1ofQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLPvmzKgbhCgbThyK/A9nEJAwsz5dh9QBByAwwmZ+MU8bHNIaxMAdXXG/Ba9qzrmmnIu+TigEDJrwMcPw== X-Received: by 10.157.38.246 with SMTP id i51mr8733515otd.112.1468496732869; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 04:45:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.157.4.197 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 04:45:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: h0-w-srscLvnf-8sKlrLCEGZCCw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:121063 Archived-At: On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:15 AM, Andrew Hyatt wrote: >> It appears that the OP was indeed about face extension across (hard) line breaks >> into indented text on the next line. >> >> That was what my original response was to: If it hurts, don't do it; and let's >> not assume that whitespace should not show the face attributes of the adjacent >> text just because it represents indentation. > > Now we are almost 5 years into the future, and this bug hasn't been > updated. Drew's response didn't get agreement or disagreement, so would > anyone object if we considered this not a bug, as he suggests? > > > Hmm, seems somewhat related to http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=23574 (that one is about underline from the end of line to the edge of screen, this one is about underline from beginning of next line). Perhaps the new defcustom discussed there (http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=23574#67) should cover this too?